COVID-19

The pros and cons of extending additional unemployment benefits

Sabri Ben-Achour Jul 28, 2020
Heard on: Marketplace
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Baristas prepare drinks at a coffee shop in North Carolina. Some say high unemployment benefits are discouraging employees from returning to work during the pandemic. Al Drago/Getty Images
COVID-19

The pros and cons of extending additional unemployment benefits

Sabri Ben-Achour Jul 28, 2020
Baristas prepare drinks at a coffee shop in North Carolina. Some say high unemployment benefits are discouraging employees from returning to work during the pandemic. Al Drago/Getty Images
HTML EMBED:
COPY


Expanded unemployment benefits are set to expire at the end of July. The Republican proposal in the Senate would cut those benefits from $600 a week to $200 until they can be adjusted this fall to 70% of a worker’s previous income. 

There is a debate over the costs and benefits of expanded unemployment payments. 

Deniz Kocak runs Turkuaz restaurant in the Midtown West area of Manhattan. As restaurants reopened there last month, she started calling her staff back to work, and some said no. They told her that unemployment was paying them more than what she would.

“On average, they are getting $800, $900 a week,” Kocak said. “Some of them didn’t even used to make that much per week.”

She said it complicated her reopening.

“We did get some [Paycheck Protection Program money] from the government, but part of that getting turned into a grant is reliant on part of it being used as payroll,” she said. “And of course, it’s very hard to get the people back.”

As the expiration date for benefits got closer, Kocak said, workers eventually came back. There’s a debate over how common Kocak’s situation is. 

“Lots of workers in the economy are currently eligible for unemployment benefits that exceed their lost wages,” said Joseph Vavra, a professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business.

But he said it’s not clear how often that causes someone to not take a job. People value certainty, he said, and some workers may go back to work for health care, for example. 

Vavra also said if an employer reports that it’s re-offered a job to a laid-off employee and that employee declined to come back because he or she makes more on unemployment, the worker is no longer eligible for benefits. 

“To me, it seems less likely that a worker is going to refuse to go back to work in this very uncertain labor market,” Vavra said.

Heidi Shierholz, senior economist and director of policy at the Economic Policy Institute, said some amount of expanded unemployment benefits is a good idea beyond their current expiration date.

“Government spending on unemployment insurance benefits is one of the most, if not the most, effective things the federal government can do for stimulating the economy,” Shierholz said.

Unemployment benefits help the people who get them, but they also help the people and businesses that recipients spend the money with, preserving jobs in that way.

Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said unemployment benefits can’t stay so high indefinitely without potentially slowing a recovery, but now is not the time to make drastic cuts.

“Probably the smart thing to do is to unwind it slowly,” he said.

How slowly? That’s what’s being negotiated right now. 

COVID-19 Economy FAQs

It’s still the question on everyone’s minds: What’s going on with extra COVID-19 unemployment benefits?

The $600-a-week payments have ended, officially, as of July 31. For now, there is no additional federal pandemic unemployment assistance. House Democrats want to renew the $600 payments. Senate Republicans have proposed giving the unemployed 70% of their most recent salary by this October, when state unemployment offices have had time to reconfigure their computer systems to do those calculations. Until then, jobless workers would just get another $200. But, nothing has been agreed upon yet.

What’s the latest on evictions?

For millions of Americans, things are looking grim. Unemployment is high, and pandemic eviction moratoriums have expired in states across the country. And as many people already know, eviction is something that can haunt a person’s life for years. For instance, getting evicted can make it hard to rent again. And that can lead to spiraling poverty.

Which retailers are requiring that people wear masks when shopping? And how are they enforcing those rules?

Walmart, Target, Lowe’s, CVS, Home Depot, Costco — they all have policies that say shoppers are required to wear a mask. When an employee confronts a customer who refuses, the interaction can spin out of control, so many of these retailers are telling their workers to not enforce these mandates. But, just having them will actually get more people to wear masks.

You can find answers to more questions on unemployment benefits and COVID-19 here.

As a nonprofit news organization, our future depends on listeners like you who believe in the power of public service journalism.

Your investment in Marketplace helps us remain paywall-free and ensures everyone has access to trustworthy, unbiased news and information, regardless of their ability to pay.

Donate today — in any amount — to become a Marketplace Investor. Now more than ever, your commitment makes a difference.