After nine years of no change, is the federal minimum wage irrelevant?
Share Now on:
If President Donald Trump does not increase the federal minimum wage within the next two years, it will be more than ten years since its last increase — the longest that the federal minimum wage has remained unchanged since it was enacted. With the federal minimum wage stuck at $7.25, states and cities across the U.S. have increased their local minimum wages instead — some going as far as more than doubling the amount to $15 an hour.
Republicans have long argued that there is no need for a federal minimum wage and that states should be the ones setting the wages for their workers. During his presidential campaign, Trump said that while he does not know how people survive on $7.25 an hour, he wants states to decide what their minimum wage is because “states have to compete with each other.”
At the beginning of this year, 18 states saw their minimum wage go up. Eight states automatically increased their rates based on the cost of living and ten states increased their rates under previously approved legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Currently, 29 states and the District of Columbia pay a minimum wage that’s higher than the federal minimum wage.
Only three other presidents have not raised minimum wage while in office
Come July of this year it will be nine years since the federal minimum wage has been increased. The other two periods when the federal minimum wage remained unchanged for this long were from January 1981 to April 1990 and from September 1997 to July 2007, according to the Department of Labor.
While the last increase took place during President Barack Obama’s first term, the increase was part of legislation passed under President George W. Bush. Obama was the third president to not increase the federal minimum wage since it was established in 1938. The other two presidents were Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan.
Months before Obama’s second term was up, then Labor Secretary Tom Perez said that Republicans were to blame for the lack of minimum wage increases during Obama’s two terms.
“They are so hellbent on making sure they never deliver a legislative victory to this president, and if they hurt their own constituents, so be it,” Perez said at the time.
However, it’s not just Republicans who have said that large increases in minimum wage might best be handled on a state-by-state basis. Even Hillary Clinton admitted at one point that one minimum wage might not work for all states and cities, but she did emphasize that there should be a national floor. During her campaign, Clinton expressed support for a bill that would have increase the minimum wage to $12 by 2020 while saying states and cities should go further than that.
Do we really need a federal minimum wage?
One of the reasons that Democrats, labor unions and worker rights activists push for keeping and increasing the federal minimum wage is because it sets a floor that cannot be crossed — especially during times of economic downturn when employers are likely to reduce wages.
“Over the long term when you go an extended period without raising the minimum wage — unless the market is doing reasonably well — you’ll either have wage stagnation where wages are just kind of remaining flat or they can start to decline in real terms as they did throughout much of the early years of Obama’s presidency,” said David Cooper, senior economic analyst at the Economic Policy Institute. “Or you can run into the situation where if there’s some crisis and there is a recession and people start getting laid off. Then wages can really start to drop if there’s nothing there to catch them.”
Another reasons why some push for a higher minimum wage is because it can drive up wages for other workers as well.
“Minimum wage plays a role in how employers set the wages of roughly the bottom 20 percent of the workforce,” Cooper said.
In 2016, more than 2.1 million workers were earning $7.25 an hour or less. One of the ways that people can be paid less than $7.25 is if they work as a tipped employee such as a waitstaff. The federal tipped minimum wage is $2.13. While that’s just a small fraction of the workforce, there is another 10 to 15 percent of the workforce whose wages are being set relative to the minimum wage – whether it be the state’s minimum wage or the federal minimum wage, according to Cooper. “If your entry level worker is earning the minimum wage, someone who has been in that job for two years might be earning 10 percent more than the minimum wage.”
Race to the bottom: without federal minimum wage some states would have no minimum wage at all
When pressed by Chuck Todd about whether there needs to be a national floor, Trump said: “No, I’d rather have the states go out and do what they have to do.”
If the federal minimum wage were to be eliminated today, workers in two states — Wyoming and Georgia — would see their wages drop to $5.15 an hour. Another five states — Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee and South Carolina — do not have a state minimum wage to begin with.
With a tight labor market where the unemployment rate is 4.1 percent and employers are competing for workers, companies are raising wages in an effort to attract the most qualified employees and so the elimination of a federal minimum wage might have little impact. However, come the next recession, those same companies could then reduce their wages below $7.25 if there is no federal minimum wage to stop them.
|Wetzel’s Pretzels’ CEO says minimum wage increase boosts business|
|My economy: A tale of two minimum wages|