British law vs. Whole internet via Twitter
A British athlete involved in a salacious scandal was awarded an injunction by a British court that prevented his name from being identified, the story reported on, or even recognizing the injunction existed. This was no mere injunction, it was a SUPER injunction. Seriously, that’s what they call it: super-injunction. It’s a legal maneuver that is controversial in Britain, seeing as how it subverts not only freedom of the press but reality itself kinda. But on Twitter, life just doesn’t abide by British injunctions and tens of thousands of Twitterers have reported the guy’s name as a protest. Should Twitter be subject to British laws? Twitter is opening a London office soon but they say they’re committed to defending users’ rights to free speech.
We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.
Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.
In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.
Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.