Uber and Lyft have to classify drivers as employees, California judge orders

David Brancaccio, Kristin Schwab, and Alex Schroeder Aug 11, 2020
Heard on: Marketplace Morning Report
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Uber and Lyft have continued to put their drivers down as independent contractors, even after a new law mandating against that practice took effect. Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images

Uber and Lyft have to classify drivers as employees, California judge orders

David Brancaccio, Kristin Schwab, and Alex Schroeder Aug 11, 2020
Uber and Lyft have continued to put their drivers down as independent contractors, even after a new law mandating against that practice took effect. Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images
HTML EMBED:
COPY

A court in California has told Uber and Lyft that drivers are employees not independent contractors, temporarily at least.

Marketplace’s Kristin Schwab has more. The following is an edited transcript of her conversation with “Marketplace Morning Report” host David Brancaccio.

David Brancaccio: California has a law to this effect that’s under challenge?

Kristin Schwab: Yes, a new law, called Assembly Bill 5, went into effect at the start of the year. And it did reclassify gig workers as employees. But Uber and Lyft have continued to put their drivers down as independent contractors. Uber has tried to skirt the law by letting workers set their own rates so the company can say drivers are truly contractors who work for themselves. So this preliminary injunction is the state basically calling these ride-hailing companies out and saying, hey, what you’re doing is not legal and you need to comply.

Brancaccio: So what happens now?

Schwab: Lyft and Uber have 10 days to appeal. If the judge sides with the state, the companies could owe penalties and compensation to drivers. And this isn’t the only thing the gig economy is keeping an eye on right now. In November, California voters will likely see a ballot measure from these companies as an exemption that, if passed, would classify app-based drivers as contractors. Obviously ride-hailing companies want to win this or it will cost a lot more to operate.

Brancaccio: What does this mean for the gig economy?

Schwab: California is Uber and Lyft’s biggest market. And though this preliminary injunction targets them, it sends a message to other gig-based companies, like food delivery apps. Because it would be a big step in forcing these companies to pay minimum wage and overtime, plus other things like vehicle mileage. And experts say this could push more states to do the same. For riders, it could mean higher costs.

As a nonprofit news organization, our future depends on listeners like you who believe in the power of public service journalism.

Your investment in Marketplace helps us remain paywall-free and ensures everyone has access to trustworthy, unbiased news and information, regardless of their ability to pay.

Donate today — in any amount — to become a Marketplace Investor. Now more than ever, your commitment makes a difference.