1

Geoengineering: A way to cool earth

A green world

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

BILL RADKE: We're in a carbon-constrained world. International talks to stop global warming are stalled,
Congress is not too interested in a carbon cap. There is one more way to cool the planet, but it's controversial. This month, a congressional committee will issue a report on something called geoengineering.

Marketplace's Nancy Marshall Genzer explains.


NANCY MARSHALL GENZER: It sounds like science fiction. But some scientists say they can control the climate by coating the atmosphere with particles that deflect sunlight. Or by growing ocean organisms that feed on greenhouse gases.

Geoengineering is popular because it doesn't require cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. It gets rid of the gases instead. But some climate scientists say it's a temporary solution at best.

Brenda Ekwurzel is with the Union of Concerned Scientists.

BRENDA EKWURZEL: It's kind of like putting your finger in a dike. But the pressure of the water is still building behind the dike. And you haven't gotten rid of the root cause.

Thomas Ackerman teaches atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington. He says we can't ignore geoengineering because some countries are already funding research.

TOM ACKERMAN: That attracts people who think that they can find a way to make money.

Ackerman says the world needs a consensus on geoengineering before one country resets the world's thermostat unilaterally.

In Washington, I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer for Marketplace.

About the author

Nancy Marshall-Genzer is a senior reporter for Marketplace based in Washington, D.C. covering daily news.
Tracie Ewing's picture
Tracie Ewing - Oct 5, 2010

Coat the atmosphere with particles that deflect sunlight? Isn't that called smog? Don't we already have enough of that? And wouldn't lessening the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth be counterproductive to agriculture and life in general? Plants NEED ultraviolet radiation to drive the chemical reactions that allow them to digest carbon dioxide.

I'm all for innovation, but in this instance, I think we're taking it just a bit too far, and could potentially do more harm than good.

We need to give up on the weird science and look at some truly viable ways to correct the damage that humans are doing to the planet.