3

FDA studies arsenic found in rice products

A man holds a handful of rice grains at a market.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Consumer Reports is recommending that Americans limit their rice consumption, after finding arsenic in over 60 rice products they tested.  The group is urging the government to set limits on arsenic in rice,  just like it does for water.

But before you start tossing out your Rice Krispies and Rice-A-Roni, here’s what we know. The Food and Drug Administration has been monitoring arsenic levels in rice for years. Both the FDA and Consumer Reports have found arsenic in common rice products. The FDA  says the levels “merit a deeper look." Consumer Reports calls them “troubling.”

“What we know is that it’s a known carcinogen and that the amounts we’re seeing are certainly within the range of the limits we set for water, which even those limits carry quite a high level of risk,” says Urvashi Rangan,  the director of Consumer Reports’ Consumer Safety and Sustainability Group.

But FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg says there’s no evidence, yet, that rice is unsafe to eat. She says her agency won’t make any conclusions until next year, after the agency completes its own, wider study.  She says the best advice for rice eaters right now is a diet of “balance and moderation.”

Hamburg suggests there are many other grains that consumers can substitute for rice and if parents are especially worried about products like baby rice cereal, for which doctors often recommend, they can substitute oatmeal.

She cautioned there has been a lot of variability in the testing so far. And she says studies of subgroups in the United States that traditionally eat a rice-heavy diet (Asians, Pacific Islanders) don’t show higher levels of cancer associated with arsenic toxicity.

Consumer Reports found higher levels of arsenic in rice grown in the south central part of the United States than in California.  They speculate that it may be related to arsenic-laced pesticides lingering in the soil from cotton cultivation and poultry manure.

Some food companies are already responding to concerns about arsenic in food. Gerber issued a statement saying that earlier this year “we decided to exclusively use California rice in the production of our rice-containing infant nutrition products … because California rice has the lowest naturally occurring arsenic levels for rice grown in the United States.”

The U.S. rice industry said it was cooperating with the FDA in its studies but saw no reason for consumers to stop eating rice products.  The USA Rice Federation put out a statement calling  rice “an important, nutritional and safe part of a healthy diet.” 

 

About the author

Sarah Gardner is a reporter on the Marketplace sustainability desk covering sustainability news spots and features.
Emily Rose's picture
Emily Rose - Mar 5, 2013

Reports have not yet been published and tests have no results, and some says the presence of arsenic all are just whirling the mind. The content of arsenic is not an actual proof as FDA says but it will surely look into the matter. In the fact of the more content of arsenic it is really essential to not to provide to the baby meals if one is not sure of the results.
http://www.babysteals.com.au/terms-and-conditions

father_of_two's picture
father_of_two - Sep 25, 2012

Among 32 brands of rice in Consumer's Reports study were three brands of rice from India, shown below with levels of inorganic arsenic which is a human carcinogen (can cause cancer).

365 Everyday Value Organic Indian Basmati White: 64.7 - 78.5 ppb
Archer Farms Organic Basmati: 29.4 - 49.2 ppb
Trader Joe's White Basmati: 55.1 - 63.7 ppb

The lowest level for domestic product was:

Lundberg California White Basmati 27.9 - 35.4 ppb

The conclusion of the study was that rice produced in four states: Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Texas had higher arsenic content than rice produced elsewhere.

Another conclusion was that brown rice had higher arsenic content than white rice.

The study was done on products mostly purchased in New York area, with at least three samples from each product analyzed. So there is some variability in the resuls between the samples, especially for brands with higher level of arsenic. For example, arsenic levels for Martin Long Grain Brown grown in Missouri ranges between 83.7 and 214 ppb.

For comparison, EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency)
Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic in drinking water is 10 ppb.

So, even though the study is limited, it does raise valid concern, and it should be
addressed by FDA, who is authority on these matters.

My younger daughter is starting on solid foods, so we are especially concerned about safety of rice baby cereals.
Right now we are giving her Nestle Gerber rice cereal, however there is no information
on packaging about the origin of rice. I applaud Gerber's decision to use California-grown rice
even with absense of FDA requirement. It shows that they really care about the health effects of their products.

jgurtz's picture
jgurtz - Sep 20, 2012

So how about rice imported from other countries? I eat a fair amount of rice from India and other Asian countries