The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Tuesday about a case that centers on whether there should be a six-year time limit on being able to sue a company over its oversight of funds it offers in a retirement plan. The question has pitted the AARP, the U.S. Solicitor General and others against groups representing employers and the financial industry.
“The people who run these plans have a legitimate interest in saying: look you can’t sue us for 20 years of damage,” says Norman Stein, a professor at Drexel University who is an expert on laws surrounding employee benefits and pensions.
But employers are arguing that that six-year limit should apply not to damages, but to when a fund was introduced into a company’s retirement plan. That would limit the number of funds subject to lawsuits.
We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.
Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.
In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.
Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.