You’ve seen them on TV a lot lately—campaign ads featuring factory workers wearing hard hats, safety goggles and sporting either sad or happy looks on their faces.
Elizabeth Wilner analyzes political campaign ads for Kantar Media. Wilner said if people only go by what’s shown on TV, they’d think more Americans punch the clock at the plant every day than actually do. Manufacturing accounts for just nine percent of employment in the United States, she says. So what’s with all the hard hats? Why are politicians so fixated on factory workers?
“There’s a narrow sliver of the electorate that both candidates are playing to. And that sliver happens to run through Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania — places where a lot of people are dependent on the health of manufacturing” said Wilner. “So those people’s concerns are disproportionately represented in campaign ads.”
Mike Earnest was featured in a pro-Obama campaign ad released in June.
Earnest said that even though fewer people are working in manufacturing and more in the service industry, he’s glad manufacturing’s still getting some attention. “That’s where the money is at,” Earnest said. “If you go work at the grocery store up town, you’re working for minimum wage. You can’t survive on minimum wage.”
Earnest worked for a company that was bought out by Bain Capital, which at the time was run by Mitt Romney. Bain shut the factory in Indiana down, and Earnest was out a job. He said he’s voted Republican his whole life, but this year is different.
“I cannot vote for Mitt Romney. I cannot. He took my job,” said Earnest.
Gus Faucher is an economist with PNC Financial Services. He argues that a bunch of campaign ads don’t negate the fact that there isn’t much either candidate can do right now about manufacturing’s shrinking role in America.
“There are policies that help around the edges” said Faucher. “But I don’t think that those larger term trends of productivity and globalization are going to go away.” No matter what the campaign ads say before November.