3

Dabbling in social lending

Question: Hi Chris - I was listening to the marketplace money podcast (6/10/2011) and one of the guests mentioned peer-to-peer lending. I googled the topic and found several websites dealing with this issue. This looks really appealing since I have extra cash sitting in the 0.25% saving account. But on the flip side, it looks really too good to be true. What could be the problems for peer-to-peer lending? And is there any reputable website for peer-to-peer lending? Brit, Norwalk, CA

Answer: Peer-to-peer lending (also called social lending) is among the more intriguing personal finance innovations of recent years. The business started 5 years ago and peer-to-peer websites bring together online individual lenders and individual borrowers for a fee. Think combining Match.com and Ebay.com. A website for learning about the business and keeping up on industry experience is Sociallending.

The two main companies are Prosper Marketplace Inc. and the Lending Club Corp. The bread and butter business of peer-to-peer lending has been living off high interest credit card debt.

Let's say you're paying 18% to 21% on your credit in a low rate environment. The peer-to-peer lending companies figured there would be individuals willing to lend money at, say, 9% to 12% for someone eager to shed the high rate credit card debt. When it works it's a win-win deal.

The peer-to-peer companies have recently been filling in another niche: Matching small-business owners and individual lenders. The Wall Street Journal has an overview of the trend:

The returns on these loans vary, depending on the length of the loan, its interest rate and, perhaps most importantly, the borrowers credit quality. It's hardly surprising that the default rate of less creditworthy borrowers is higher than their creditworthy peers. There is no free lunch.

My sense is that there are two kinds of lenders in this market. Some people dabble in it, curious about how it works, hoping that they'll make a higher rate of interest on their money. Others seem to turn it into much more of a portfolio strategy and spend far more time deciding where to lend and how much. If you're intrigued I would stay cautious. Put a little money at risk and see how you like it.

I would not put your emergency savings at risk.

About the author

Chris Farrell is the economics editor of Marketplace Money.
Peter Renton's picture
Peter Renton - Jun 21, 2011

Chris, I appreciate the mention and the link to my site. I think you are right that most people start investing in peer to peer lending in a small way and then increase their investment as they get comfortable with the platform. But I agree you should never put your emergency savings into peer to peer lending.

One thing that your readers should also know is that peer to peer lending is completely transparent. What I mean by this is that you can download the entire loan history of Lending Club and Prosper and analyze all the loans yourself.

Today, both companies have some big institutional investors who have done just that and have decided to invest large sums of money. The peer to peer lending industry is maturing into a legitimate asset class that helps provide diversification to an investment portfolio.

Chris Farrell's picture
Chris Farrell - Jun 21, 2011

Thanks. The transparency of the business is important to emphasize.

Janet's picture
Janet - Jul 5, 2011

Unfortunately, the information provided to "lenders" is pretty minimal, and asking serious questions of borrowers is impossible. I think this is a great idea but wouldn't give my money to someone I can't drill about how they will pay it back -- not even $25. Nor do the companies have any incentive to get my money back if there is a default.

If these companies are serious, they need to allow investors to get real info on borrowers, and show they will pursue defaults to the fullest extent possible.

Also, Lending Club started calling me endlessly when I signed up. Ugh. Like I need that.