4
Impact of Italy's ruling on Google
The home page of Google pulled up on a computer.
To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.
TEXT OF STORY
Bob Moon: Google executives are on the hook for a much different issue of corporate responsibility: a privacy ruling against the company that came down in Milan, Italy, today. Three top Google officials got 6-month suspended sentences for allowing a video to be posted on the Google Video site showing an emotionally-disturbed boy being bullied. The case highlights deep-seated differences over Internet freedom and privacy.
Here's Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman.
MITCHELL HARTMAN: Back in 2006, some Italian bullies filmed themselves beating up a boy with autism, then posted the video to Google. The company pulled it down two months later, when they were contacted by Italian police. Then helped catch and convict the attackers.
ART BRODSKY: But that wasn't good enough for the Italian government.
Art Brodsky is with the group Public Knowledge.
BRODSKY: They felt that the Google executives, none of whom had anything to do with this video, should also be held accountable.
The court found the executives criminally liable for the video, basically saying the company should have censored it right when it was posted and someone complained. Long before Italian cops asked them to do something about it.
Internet companies say that's contrary to basic rights of free expression we rely on in the U.S. It's also impractical, says Brian Cooley of CNET.
BRIAN COOLEY: Internet providers, Twitter or Facebook, or Google and its YouTube, can't be vetting everything that's posted on the Web. The Web has far too many posts every tenth of a second.
Google's Scott Rubin says the company will appeal.
SCOTT RUBIN: It's a chilling, chilling decision.
Matt Zimmerman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation says the U.S. shields Internet speech from government interference. In Europe -- not so much.
MATT ZIMMERMAN: The First Amendment provides much greater protection for free expression than do comparable laws in Europe.
If the Italian ruling stands, Google and other sites in Europe might have to block everything from nasty restaurant reviews to political satire, to protect themselves from defamation and privacy lawsuits.
I'm Mitchell Hartman for Marketplace.
The decision of the Italian govt to prosecute Google is hard to understand. If Google had not allowed the video to air, the criminals would likely never have been prosecuted and that poor boy would have never received justice. It's very hard to see the logic in that decision.
No, no, no! Please do not label people with autism as emotionally disturbed! Autism is not a mental illness! I'm a parent of a son with autism, and listening to stories about our precious children being injured and bullied is heartbreaking, but listening to a story on national news that perpetuates a long-dispelled myth that autism is a mental illness is infuriating!
Craigslist is policed by it's users.
This is not mentioned in the report.
If YouTube did the same they would not have had this situation.
Google is guilty.
This story is inaccurate and implies dire consequences if Google and the offending posters are held accountable for there actions .
If it take 100 or more complaints to pull an offending video no bad restaurants reviews will be effected.
The whole argument is blown out the door.
I hope NPR and Mr Hartman address this issue.
