7

Cable companies fear more than the Internet

TV remote

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

JEREMY HOBSON: The Cable TV industry is in Chicago today for its annual get-together. And this year the Internet isn't the only threat to cable.

In this economy it's getting too expensive for a lot of people, as Sally Herships reports.


SALLY HERSHIPS: This statistic is getting a lot of play this week at the Cable Show.

MARK ROBICHAUX: The bottom 40 percent of U.S. households have already exhausted their disposable income.

Mark Robichaux is Editor in Chief of Multichannel News.

ROBICHAUS: So there's not a whole lot left for clothing, or for cable. You can't have a business if people can't afford your product.

That hasn't stopped the big cable operators from raising prices. Robichaux says the average subscription costs 30 percent more than it did five years ago.

Kartik Hosanager teaches Internet media at Wharton. He says some cable industry execs have talked about offering lower cost options but so far there's been little action.

KARTIK HOSANAGER: It might change in the distant future but it's not going to happen in the immediate future.

Hosanager says first cable companies will need to accept that the old model is in danger. This week's downbeat meeting may have signaled a first step.

I'm Sally Herships for Marketplace.

About the author

Sally Herships is a regular contributor to Marketplace.
AMANDA CARPER's picture
AMANDA CARPER - Jul 16, 2011

IT DOES NOT TAKE A DEGREE TO KNOW IT IS RIDICULOUS TO PAY FOR WHAT THEY SAY IS BETTER PROGRAMMING. I HAVE NOT PAID FOR IT SINCE 1993 AND I REFUSE TO. FREE TV IS FINE FOR ME. I ALSO HAVE TO MANY ALTERNATIVES AT HAND THAT ARE FREE AND DO NEED TO DEAL WITH ANY MORE RISING COSTS ON TOP OF MY OTHER OBLIGATIONS.

Mark Ueber's picture
Mark Ueber - Jun 20, 2011

I dropped cable two years ago after a rate increase. No one should have to pay anything, much less $80.00 a month for informercials, commercials, reruns, reality programs, political blow-hards, and the like. It's not just the cost, it's the lousy programing as well.

Lee Emery's picture
Lee Emery - Jun 16, 2011

I was just thinking yesterday about dropping cable after sitting through 8 minutes of freaking commercials. I'd get rid of it but my wife likes some of the shows on the cable channels even though the majority of the shows are on basic tv.

Tracie Ewing's picture
Tracie Ewing - Jun 16, 2011

@JMiller-Oddly, I majored in radio/tv too(although, the school I attended called it Mass Comm.),even though I've never really been one to watch much TV.

I canceled my cable subscription years ago. I still own a TV (a hand me down from a friend), but only because my kids needed something to play the X-box and watch DVDs on.

Kate Adams's picture
Kate Adams - Jun 16, 2011

I don't even own a television. If it's not available on the web, I live without it.

J Miller's picture
J Miller - Jun 16, 2011

Yessir!! Gouge the customer in the name of deregulation, then wonder why the golden goose is leaving the nest. My income is 0ver $90K. I haven't had a need for the expensive mind-numbers that pass for television programming in years. I rely on PBS over the air. Better programming, better service, better information. I have an MA in telecom from Michigan State.

J Ringer's picture
J Ringer - Jun 16, 2011

I have a number of blue collar friends who have not found employment in three years. Yes, they all cancelled their cable, reluctantly. They now use their Internet to watch shows.