Lewis testifies on Merrill Lynch deal

Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis


Steve Chiotakis: The head of Bank of America faces a fresh grilling before a congressional panel today. Kenneth Lewis has been under fire from stockholders. who complain that he failed to disclose the depth of Merrill Lynch's financial troubles when B of A took over the brokerage late last year. Here's our senior business correspondent Bob Moon.

Bob Moon: It's beginning to sound like the U.S. government's efforts to head off a global financial collapse last September had all the markings of a scene from Mission Impossible.

MISSION IMPOSSIBLE CLIP: The secretary will disavow all knowledge of your actions.

Kenneth Lewis suggests that kind of scenario in testimony he's prepared for lawmakers today. The B of A chief claims former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed chief Ben Bernanke pressured him to go through with the deal for Merrill Lynch. Lewis says he had serious second thoughts over what he now calls "significant accelerating losses" at the brokerage.

Secretary Paulson has said he left it up to Lewis whether to disclose his doubts to B of A investors. What lawmakers want to know is why, then, did Lewis sign off on the deal with this kind of enthusiastic pitch to his stockholders?

Kenneth Lewis: This was a unique opportunity to acquire a high-quality company that will not only greatly enhance our long-term prospects, but truly creates a firm that is unparalleled in the industry.

Emails turned up by congressional investigators, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, appear to support Lewis's claim that he felt pressured by top government officials to put the best face on the deal.

I'm Bob Moon for Marketplace.

Log in to post2 Comments

After two years of research for several investors who purchased various properties in FL and NC to build investment homes. The loans closed in August 2005 and the Construction - Perm Product pulled from the market this February 2009 began construction in 2007. Paying interest for 32 months and discovering the term mezzanine financing based on 30 year speculative appraisals, and when the documents were requested, notes, and litigation began seeking the right to foreclose and seek deficiency on NIV loans, using defamatory claims such as fraud, misrepresentation, etc. Well, the answer is credit insurance from Fidelity National Family Group, Chicago, Fidelity, Trico, American Land etc insurance with endorsements that only benefit the the Owner's (Lenders not homeowners). That is what the sub-prime market consist of and how they were able to forclose within 30 days, using 1st and 2nd lien loans, or mezz. financing the regulators thought the banks were using HELOCs. As you can see some 57,000 mortgage brokrage firms generated over $3 Trillion in future equity and began servicing the accounts under FDIC insured members when instructed not to do so in early 2007. The toxic assets are those neg. amorit. loans that are about to reset in 2010 when I told the FRB in June of 08. They discovered how undercapitalised all of them were and how few consumer protections that are on the books yet unenforceable until June 15, 2009. The consequencal expungement and reparations programs are EMC SEARCH'S GIFT to those in the past harmed, those presenting facing such shocking and arrogant actions of executives and compensations such as SunTrust (819M loss one week...the next (-1.9B) and now required to capitalize over $2.2B. Those going forward will truly own a pure first mortgage, at Fair Market Value from a Governt. Approved Appraiser, and the Banks such as Chases CEO who came out truly AAA+ will receive the bulk of the remaining 350B in the Amended TALF fund....not to mention the amount of legislation that just passed 243-3 included some surprises for those individuals who ever sold, enforced, or made a false claim from Obmama's new definition of "financial institution" and the President's amended Reverse False Claims Act. Now that is By The People For the People Keeping Corporate Greed and Regulators In Check.

Doesn't matter if he was pressured ... or not... Lewis is THE CEO... .it is his responsibility to UNDERSTAND the DEAL.... If it is right or not for the Stock Holders..... YES THE STOCK HOLDERS.... and if it is a bad deal is HIS RESPONSIBILITY TO HAVE SOME BACKBONE AND SAY SO....

He appears to be a gready snotnozed punk like the others who cased this mess... He deserves what he gets....

Doesn't excuss the actions of others if they use pressure... but then the whole economy was going to melt down due to the .... ethical actions of these financial super titans.... so maybe a little arm twisting was in order... hard to say.....

But Lewis deserves all the grief he is receiving over this....

With Generous Support From...