Marketplace®
Every story is an economic story

Our homes have gotten bigger — but are we happier?

Smaller homes designed around spaces for gathering and forging social connections mean more for our well-being, says Mike Coren of The Washington Post.

Download
The "McMansion effect" means that we put more stock not in how big our houses are, but whether they're larger or smaller than our neighbors' homes.
The "McMansion effect" means that we put more stock not in how big our houses are, but whether they're larger or smaller than our neighbors' homes.
Scott Olson/Getty Images

Since 1970, the average size of a single-family home has risen from around 1,700 square feet to more than 2,400. At the same time, fewer people live in these larger homes — the average new home now has about 940 square feet per inhabitant. But does having more space per person make us happier in our homes?

Not according to Mike Coren, writing for the Washington Post’s “Climate Coach” blog.

“It’s kind of the opposite of the American dream, which is the assumption that if we had a bigger house, we’d be happier, we’d have more freedom,” Coren said. “In fact, for most people, it’s the opposite.”

“Marketplace” host Amy Scott talked to Coren about his reporting on what actually makes us happier in our homes and why it might mean living in closer quarters.

To listen to their conversation, use the audio player above

Related Topics

Collections:

Latest Episodes

View All Shows
  • Marketplace
    a day ago
    25:17
  • Marketplace Morning Report
    2 days ago
    6:24
  • Marketplace Tech
    2 days ago
    16:16
  • This Is Uncomfortable
    3 days ago
    28:46
  • Million Bazillion
    5 days ago
    30:57
  • Make Me Smart
    4 months ago
    24:33