Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Corner Office from Marketplace

The CEO of Lands' End knows exactly who his customers are

Jun 19, 2019

Latest Episodes

Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Tech
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Make Me Smart with Kai and Molly
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy

Pennsylvania weighs nuclear subsidies after Three Mile Island

Miles Bryan May 20, 2019
Share Now on:
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Steam rises out of the nuclear plant on Three Mile Island in Middletown, Pennsylvania on March 26, 2019.
ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/Getty Images

Forty years ago, Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in central Pennsylvania was the site of America’s worst nuclear accident. But that doesn’t deter Steve Letavic from showing it off.

“What you see is a jewel of our community, part of the fabric of our community,” said Letavic. He manages Londonderry Township, where the nuclear plant is located.

That “jewel” will soon lose the last of its luster. Three Mile Island’s parent company, Exelon, announced on May 8 that the plant will be prematurely retired by the end of September.

Letavic says that will be economically devastating to the region: 675 well-paying jobs eliminated, and about $1 million in real estate tax revenue lost.

But Letavic makes more than an economic case for the plant: he says he supports it as an environmentalist, too.

Londonderry Township manager Steve Letavic says losing Three Mile Island will be economically devastating for his region. Credit: Miles Bryan

“Look, I’m as green as you’ll get. I’m an outdoorsman. And when you look at what climate change is doing to our environment, it’s not hard to realize we have to have this as part of our energy portfolio,” Letavic said.

Exelon made that case as well: arguing, unsuccessfully, that the state legislature should provide it with clean-energy subsidies.

That might be surprising for anyone familiar with the accident. On March 28, 1979, one of the plant’s two nuclear reactors partially melted down, releasing some radiation. The accident became a potent symbol of the risks of nuclear power, said Natasha Zaretsky, author of “Radiation Nation: Three Mile Island and the Political Transformation of the 1970s.”

“There had been, prior to the accident, a growing anti-reactor movement,” Zaretsky said. “But I think it would be fair to say that the 1979 accident was sort of the nail in the coffin.”

Most studies on the effects of radioactivity released during the accident have not found conclusive evidence it resulted in long-term health problems, but scientists have cautioned they can’t rule that out.

Lately, though, nuclear industry advocates in Pennsylvania have been pushing nuclear energy’s climate change credentials: a recent report by a bipartisan state legislative caucus on nuclear energy found that Pennsylvania’s nuclear plants produce more than 93% of the state’s emission-free energy, and prevent the release of more than 37 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually.

That kind of argument has helped nuclear power companies get public subsidies in states like Illinois, New York and New Jersey, at a time when nuclear has been struggling to compete in the private market against cheap natural gas.

Ahmed Abdulla is an assistant research scientist at the Center for Energy Research at UC San Diego, where he models how we will transition to a low-carbon future.

“All the evidence suggests that the existing renewable technologies are not sufficient to make up for nuclear’s loss if you are talking about the sort of deep decarbonization we need,” Abdulla said.

But some environmental groups that oppose nuclear power say these subsidies are a waste of taxpayers’ money.

“It’s deceptive marketing, right? And deceptive lobbying,” said Timothy Judson, executive director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service.

Judson points out that although nuclear power plants do not emit carbon, they do create nuclear waste, a byproduct that can be radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years.

“There’s a lot of different ways to poison the environment [other] than by burning fossil fuels,” Judson said.

In Pennsylvania, nuclear energy advocates are still making their case. They’re urging the legislature to pass public subsidies for the state’s four remaining nuclear power plants.

If you’re a member of your local public radio station, we thank you — because your support helps those stations keep programs like Marketplace on the air.  But for Marketplace to continue to grow, we need additional investment from those who care most about what we do: superfans like you.

Your donation — as little as $5 — helps us create more content that matters to you and your community, and to reach more people where they are – whether that’s radio, podcasts or online.

When you contribute directly to Marketplace, you become a partner in that mission: someone who understands that when we all get smarter, everybody wins.

Make a good investment!

Looking for a great deal?
Get ALL THREE of our new thank-you gifts when you donate $120.

This is a limited time offer – so act soon!