Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy

Latest Episodes

Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Make Me Smart with Kai and Molly
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy
Marketplace Morning Report
Download
HTML Embed
HTML EMBED
Click to Copy

Two fertilizer giants merge to spur their growth

Jed Kim Sep 12, 2016
Share Now on:
HTML EMBED:
COPY
While the Potash-Agrium merger is expected to save $500 million annually, some warn of potentially negative consequences for farmers, like paying more for their potash.
Sustainable Sanitation Alliance/Wikimedia Commons

If you’re a farmer and really want your crops to grow, you’re probably going to turn to fertilizers to make it happen. If you’re a major fertilizer company looking to grow, however, one of the methods left is merging with another company. Two major Canadian fertilizer companies have announced intentions to join and form the world’s largest crop-nutrient supplier. 

The two companies are Potash Corp. and Agrium Inc. Chuck Magro, CEO of Agrium, would retain his title in the new group. 

“This is an exciting day for Agrium and Potash Corp.,” Magro said in a conference call announcing the merger today. “Together, we are combining in a merger of equals to create a world-class integrated global supplier of crop inputs.”

He said the market cap for the new company is estimated at $26 billion.

Potash is the world’s largest fertilizer producer, and Agrium has a large retail network. Joining the two is expected to save $500 million annually. 

“You can eliminate the passage of product from one business entity to the other, and by eliminating that passage of product, you can drive down your costs for moving product through the system,” said Roger Dahlgran, a professor of agricultural economics at the University of Arizona. 

Others see the merger as a loss of competition with a potential for negative impacts on farmers. 

“Ultimately, farmers will pay a higher price for their potash,” said Harwood Schaffer, director of the Agricultural Policy Analysis Center.

Schaffer said these kinds of agribusiness mergers were growing more commonplace in the early 2000s before the recession hit.

“Those kind of mergers stopped,” Schaffer said. “I think with a more stable economic environment, they’re ready to take up where they left off.” 

The deal joins a new wave of agribusiness mergers: Dow and Dupont; China National Chemical and Sygenta; and Bayer’s bid for Monsanto. Schaffer said the recent spate in mergers has pushed the need for more companies to adopt the same strategy to remain competitive. 

“It gets like a pingpong ball, back and forth, as you create these mega mergers,” Schaffer said. “You merge, then I merge in response to that to protect myself and to be able to compete with you. But I become larger enough that you then need to merge in reaction to my merger to keep what you perceive as your competitive power.” 

 

If you’re a member of your local public radio station, we thank you — because your support helps those stations keep programs like Marketplace on the air.  But for Marketplace to continue to grow, we need additional investment from those who care most about what we do: superfans like you.

Your donation — as little as $5 — helps us create more content that matters to you and your community, and to reach more people where they are – whether that’s radio, podcasts or online.

When you contribute directly to Marketplace, you become a partner in that mission: someone who understands that when we all get smarter, everybody wins.