Investors are having a hard time understanding what the Fed is saying. Some argue the government is just adding to uncertainty in the markets.
Alan Rechtschaffen, financial adviser at UBS, said it’s not what the Fed is telling them that’s the problem, it’s the way they’re doing it.
“I think the Fed has had a problem with its messaging lately,” he said. “And if the Fed can message appropriately, I think they’d be a lot better off, and you’d have a lot of uncertainty come out of the marketplace.”
For all the Fed’s messaging, its signals are unclear. Peter Conti-Brown, professor at the University of Pennsylvania and author of the book “The Power and Independence of the Federal Reserve,” said part of the problem might be that the Fed hasn’t been doing this long.
“It is within recent memory that the Fed has been so transparent about its decisions as it is now,” he said.
In 2011, Ben Bernanke decided that the Fed would have monthly news conferences. Conti-Brown said 20 years ago, the market had to figure things out entirely on its own.
“Even before 1994, the Fed didn’t even announce what its decision was,” he said.
For all its ambiguity, this Federal Reserve may be the most transparent in bank’s history.
If you’re a member of your local public radio station, we thank you — because your support helps those stations keep programs like Marketplace on the air. But for Marketplace to continue to grow, we need additional investment from those who care most about what we do: superfans like you.
Your donation — as little as $5 — helps us create more content that matters to you and your community, and to reach more people where they are – whether that’s radio, podcasts or online.
When you contribute directly to Marketplace, you become a partner in that mission: someone who understands that when we all get smarter, everybody wins.