Codebreaker

Do you really need media critics when you have Amazon reviews?

Adriene Hill May 17, 2012

Maybe not.  

A new study from Harvard finds that Amazon reviews (when you mash them all up) are as reliable as those from paid critics.  Via Gizmodo:

The study, carried out at Harvard Business School, analyzed the top 100 non-fiction reviews from 40 media outlets, including the New York Times, the Guardian and the Washington Post, between 2004 and 2007. The researchers then compared data from review aggregator metacritic.com to that from Amazon.

On the whole, there was broad agreement—when reviews were taken in aggregate— between critics and Amazon reviewers.

The study also found that Amazon critics were more likely to favor new writers, while critics were more likely to thumbs-up books from prize-winning authors.

We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.

Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.

In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.

Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.