🖤 Donations of all sizes power our public service journalism Give Now
Easy Sustainability Answers

Which is better for the environment, an e-reader or paper books?

Adriene Hill Sep 7, 2010

Easy Answer: It depends on how much you read and where you get your paper books.

As with a lot of environmental show-downs, clear winners are tough to come by. Borrowing books from the library is probably the most environmentally friendly way to get your reading done–but what if you’re a book buyer? Is it better to purchase a Kindle or to keep on buying your Jonathan Franzen or Nicholas Sparks novels?

According to the Cleantech Group, the “carbon emitted in the lifecycle of a Kindle is fully offset after the first year of use.” That is assuming you’re a big reader. The Cleantech data says the environmental impact of a Kindle is offset at the point that you’ve bought about 23 e-books (instead of paper books).

The study makes another assumption; that is that publishers will print fewer paper copies of books in response to e-book sales. It’s not uncommon for unsold books to be returned to the publisher and destroyed.

You can find the entire Cleantech report here:

The environmental impact of the Amazon Kindle.pdf

Photo credit: Flickr user Paul Watson.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.