7

Citi asking Treasury for bonus power

A man checks his cell phone as he passes by a branch location of Citibank in Washington, D.C.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Steve Chiotakis: As if we haven't had enough bonus business to talk about lately, there's more. The Wall Street Journal reports this morning that Citibank is asking the Treasury Department for permission to pay out retention bonuses to certain employees. As Marketplace's Steve Henn tells us, Citi's worried if it doesn't, some of its most profitable businesses could fall apart.


Steve Chiotakis: Phibro isn't a household name, but last year this little division inside CitiGroup made hundreds of millions of dollars trading commodities.

Pete Hahn is a former Citi executive who's now at the Cass School of Business in London:

Pete Hahn: Gold, grain oil, you name it. And this is an area in Citi that's doing quite well.

The head of Phibro, Andrew Hall, took home close to $100 million last year. But now that the feds have a $50 billion stake in Citi, paydays like that are politically unpalatable.

Hahn says it makes sense for Citi to keep Hall happy and keep Phibro intact. But government pay caps are a problem.

Hahn: These individuals are generating large profits, and frankly that's going to help share price and help repay taxpayers.

Citi's reportedly asking to pay top executives like Hall stock bonuses that would vest over the next three years, and in some cases could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

In Washington, I'm Steve Henn for Marketplace.

About the author

Steve Henn was Marketplace’s technology and innovation reporter for the entire portfolio of Marketplace programs until December 2011.
Tricolici Ludmila's picture
Tricolici Ludmila - Oct 1, 2010

1.Economy 4.0 with David Brancaccio

Sirius Pickles's picture
Sirius Pickles - May 1, 2009

This really hit a nerve for me.

RC Brooks's picture
RC Brooks - Apr 29, 2009

100 million? Really? That doesn't seem ridiculous to anyone else? Even if they didn't have bailout money, it is still ridiculous. The money that they pay them isn't made out of thin air, it comes from the pockets of every one of us. There is no excuse for anyone to make 100 million dollars for a bonus. Yes, there are people who make more, but it doesn't help the fact.

Keep in mind that other people (tens of thousands) are losing money or paying high interest rates to subsidize this sort of non-sense.

I would be willing to wager that there are a great many people in this country that could perform his job nearly as well for less than one percent of his bonus.

Shameful.

Miles Ellison's picture
Miles Ellison - Apr 29, 2009

Why is anyone that works for a company that is taking government assistance getting a bonus?

Bjoern Petersen's picture
Bjoern Petersen - Apr 29, 2009

Commodities trading, as done by Phibro, is of NO VALUE to the general public as it will only raise costs of the product traded. Hence the enormous profits related to last years speculative run up in commodities prices. It is similar to claiming that a Realtor's hefty fee benefits the buyer and seller.

Lloyd Arnold's picture
Lloyd Arnold - Apr 29, 2009

Citigroup wants to pay bailout money as retention bonuses. The executives in question have made profits. Well then, pay them the profits, but not bailout money.

HP Ng's picture
HP Ng - Apr 29, 2009

IF hey are so good, they can always start their own trading business. The trading of commodities is really legalized gambling for companies who are in it for the money only. There is always the case where, when employ help company make lots of money, they want huge bonuses. However, when the company loses money, someone else is left holding the bag. I say, if the employee is so good, go start your own business.