3

After earthquakes, Ohio closes wells

Fracking opponents attend a public hearing for supporters and opponents of gas-drilling, or fracking, on proposed fracking regulations in New York. The process has recently caused controversy in Ohio.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Stacey Vanek Smith: Ohio has temporarily banned hydraulic fracking in some parts of the state, after a series of rare earthquakes including one that rocked Youngstown over the weekend. Eve Troeh joins us live from the Marketplace sustainability desk. Good morning, Eve.

Eve Troeh:Good morning.

Smith: So Eve, earthquakes in Ohio -- that seems surprising. What happened?

Troeh: It is surprising. There was a 4.0 quake -- that's unusually big for Ohio. But state officials say 11 quakes have happened in the past year, all linked to this one natural gas well close to Youngstown. So they're pretty sure it's fracking that's the problem. That's when natural gas drilling companies inject high pressure fluid down into layers of rock to get natural gas out. The industry says there's no proof that causes earthquakes.

Still, the state has banned fracking -- first at this one problematic well, and now at five miles around the well. That means five wells total are closed for the foreseeable future.

Smith: Ohio is not alone in trying to restrict fracking. How have other places dealt with the risk?

Troeh: Fracking is going on all over the country, and there are many, many efforts to restrict it. Ohio follows Arkansas, Oklahoma and Texas on regulating fracking near earthquake sites. In Pennsylvania -- that's the state that's maybe made the most money on fracking -- there've been efforts at a state ban, but those haven't gone far. Yet in the state's major industrial city of Pittsburgh, the city council unanimously voted to ban it.

Now on the flipside in Colorado, the state Supreme Court just ruled that cities cannot ban fracking. But local towns there are pushing back. They're making drilling companies pay for tests of local water supplies. So in 2012, we're going to see a lot more battles over fracking. They're only going to get bigger -- in Washington and in city halls all around the U.S.

Smith: Our own Eve Troeh. Thank you Eve.

Troeh:Thank you.

About the author

Eve Troeh is a reporter on Marketplace’s Sustainability Desk, filing features and breaking stories on how sustainability issues impact business and the economy.
jeh1's picture
jeh1 - Jan 3, 2012

Mothergirth's comment reminds me of the movie "Thank You For Smoking"!

mothergirth's picture
mothergirth - Jan 3, 2012

This story is very misleading. The wells closed are not "fracking" wells. They are injection wells, wells that are used to dispose of the vast amounts of fluid used in the process of high volume slick water hydraulic fracturing to extract oil and natural gas from shale. There is a lot of information out there that is confusing the public regarding the dangers of this unregulated industry. I expect more from Marketplace. Get your facts straight so you can be a part of the solution...not the problem when it comes to informing the public.

DerFarm's picture
DerFarm - Jan 3, 2012

Big Deal.

The injections were from wastewater from a fracking site. Your objection is the same as saying Nuclear Power Plants should not be blamed for problems caused by nuclear waste disposal.