President Obama looks to reduce Social Security cost of living increases with ‘chained CPI’
Share Now on:
President Barack Obama is hunting big game. His budget proposal — which will be formally unveiled next week — is seeking a grand bargain of taxes on the rich and spending cuts. But perhaps the most controversial measure in his proposal is a move to slow payments to Social Security.
So, get ready to hear lots of talk about “chained CPI.” That’s wonk talk for altering how inflation is measured when the federal government cuts checks for Social Security, or veteran benefits.
University of Pennsylvania Economist Olivia Mitchell says imagine you’re grocery shopping.
“If the price of a breakfast cereal went up, people might substitute the generic brand instead,” he says, “and so the chained CPI takes into account that people do do those substitutions.”
Bottom line: Moving to chained CPI would slow annual cost of living increases by a fraction. Over a decade, that would cut federal spending by $130 billion and generate roughly the same in tax increases.
Paul Van de Water, an economist with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, says most taxpayers lose less than 1 percent of their after tax income in year 10 of chained CPI — and the average person on social security would lose $350.
“For a lot of people it’s not going to make a noticeable difference,” says Van de Water.
If that’s really the case, then chained CPI may become a political reality.
If you’re a member of your local public radio station, we thank you — because your support helps those stations keep programs like Marketplace on the air. But for Marketplace to continue to grow, we need additional investment from those who care most about what we do: superfans like you.
Your donation — as little as $5 — helps us create more content that matters to you and your community, and to reach more people where they are – whether that’s radio, podcasts or online.
When you contribute directly to Marketplace, you become a partner in that mission: someone who understands that when we all get smarter, everybody wins.