Ben Bierman (left) and Chris Gronet (right) explain solar technology to U.S. President Barack Obama on a tour of the Solyndra solar panel company May 26, 2010 in Fremont, Calif.
Ben Bierman (left) and Chris Gronet (right) explain solar technology to U.S. President Barack Obama on a tour of the Solyndra solar panel company May 26, 2010 in Fremont, Calif. - 
Listen To The Story

Two top executives of the solar energy company Solyndra are expected in Washington next week. But it will be far from a sight-seeing trip. They're being called to the carpet in front of a House committee to explain why Solyndra went bankrupt late last month.

Companies go under all the time, but Solyndra was the recipient of a $535 million government loan. It was supposed to usher in a new era of green energy jobs. The failure of Solyndra is touching off a heated debate about whether the Obama administration fast-tracked the loan in order to score political points.

Katie Fehrenbacher covers green technology for GigaOM. She says Solyndra was offering a new approach to solar but the numbers didn't add up.

Solyndra is "a thin film solar company," she says, "and there's actually a bunch of them that were developed in Silicon Valley around the same timeframe, 2005 to 2006, and a lot of venture capitalists put a lot of money into these firms. Solyndra was different than a lot of the other ones in that they designed their panels to be tube shaped. So instead of the flat, heavy panels of traditional solar rooftop panels, Solyndra panels are a long series of thin tubes. The overall cost of installing the system is supposed to be a lot lower than installing the traditional panels."

As to why it failed, Fehrenbacher says, "Solyndra's manufacturing costs were way too high. From the beginning, everyone knew this, that Solyndra's costs were a lot higher than their competitors and a lot higher than traditional solar panel makers. But the company's idea was through economy of scale, through building these huge factories, that the cost of manufacturing would go down. And also at the same time, that the overall cost of installing the system would be lower. So say you can hire lower-cost workers to put these on roofs without the more capital intensive systems that would need to put a traditional solar system on a roof. But clearly that didn't happen and the company ran out of money."

It's not the only one that did. Two other solar power companies went bankrupt last month as well. Marketplace's Steve Henn says, "Solar panels, photovoltaic cells from China have gotten much much cheaper. Prices have fallen between 20 to 30 percent in the last year. Even with the price reductions in solar power, it's not price-competitive technology compared with things like natural gas or nuclear power in most of the country. So it relies on subsidies and the biggest backers of solar power have been in Europe: Germany and Italy. Those economies are in turmoil now with the debt crisis and there's a real fear in the industry that their support of solar power will falter because of the financial crisis and that will lead to even more oversupply."

"I think the longer term future for solar power is bright. The Holy Grail here is that solar power gets to the point where it's competitive on price with all the other energy technology out there. It's getting much much closer, but it's not there yet, so crossing that final bridge will be tough."

Also in this program, Wilco needs your help. Not making music, they got that covered. But Wilco is running a contest online where your video can be their new background when they play in your city.

Follow John Moe at @johnmoe