TEXT OF INTERVIEW
Tess Vigeland: The automakers themselves aren’t the only ones feeling the pressure today. The Big Three are fed by all kinds of other businesses, not least of which is auto-parts suppliers. And then there’s the effect of GM and Chrysler’s woes on other, healthier car companies. Jean Jennings is editor-in-chief of Automobile Magazine. Thanks for joining us.
JEAN JENNINGS: Thank you.
Vigeland: Let’s talk about some of these knock-off effects from the announcements today regarding GM and Chrysler. Let’s start with the third of the big three, Ford. What have they been doing these last several months, you know, while the other two took bail-out money and just kinda got sicker and sicker.
JENNINGS: Well, Ford was already looking pretty good. They had been getting their ducks in a row for quite some time before this really went down. They, for instance, sold off virtually every brand, other than Volvo, that was not a Ford brand. What they wanted to do was just focus on the Oval. The second thing they did was actually mortgage everything including the Blue Oval, to amass a large amount of cash seeing that money was going to get tight pretty darn soon. So they not only have money, they have money at a very good rate.
Vigeland: Then taking a look at what may be happening in the future to GM and Chrysler. What would a bankrupty of either of those mean for Ford?
JENNINGS: It would mean that no one would be able to build cars in the United States for at least a year. That means no Japanese, none of the Europeans that are building, and not Ford because of their great dependence on a supplier industry that would just crash and burn. It takes the loss of one part to shut the whole thing down.
Vigeland: So it’s all about the auto parts at this point
JENNINGS: It’s all about the parts. It’s all about the parts.
Vigeland: Well, Jean, let me ask you to kinda look into your crystal ball and tell us maybe what this market is going to look like in a year. Will there be a Detroit Big Three?
JENNINGS: We know that there will be Ford because as I said they’ve put their ducks in a row, and it’s meant a lot to the average consumer out there. My 79-year-old aunt in New Orleans knows that Ford didn’t take the money, so they must be doing OK, right? So they have product, they are poised for when things turn around. The Fiat deal…
Vigeland: With Chrysler?
JENNINGS: Without Fiat, Chrysler has nothing. With Fiats, they have Fiats. So I would say things will be a little dark and sketchy at Chrysler. If there is a Fiat deal. Without a Fiat deal, it’s finished.
Vigeland: And GM?
JENNINGS: General Motors is such a huge company. I would expect that now they will do the hard job of eliminating as many brands as possible. Dealers will be going out of business, and there will be a lot of pain and suffering.
Vigeland: Jean Jennings is the editor-in-chief of Automobile Magazine. Thanks so much for steering us through today’s news.
JENNINGS: Thank you.
Marketplace is on a mission.
We believe Main Street matters as much as Wall Street, economic news is made relevant and real through human stories, and a touch of humor helps enliven topics you might typically find…well, dull.
Through the signature style that only Marketplace can deliver, we’re on a mission to raise the economic intelligence of the country—but we don’t do it alone. We count on listeners and readers like you to keep this public service free and accessible to all. Will you become a partner in our mission today?