3
Study: A hotter climate is pretty much baked in
An indicator board displays a temperature of 38 degrees Celsius (100 fahrenheit) in the French southern city of Toulouse, on Aug. 17, 2012.
To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.
The goal of U.N. climate talks in Doha, Qatar, is to keep atmospheric warming within 2 degrees Celsius of pre-industrial levels. That's 3.6 Fahrenheit.
But a new academic tally from the Global Carbon Project finds emissions peaked again in 2011, and are likely to set a new record in 2012 as well. Lead scientist Glen Peters in Norway says with every new power plant built, emissions are locked in.
"The decisions we made yesterday and the year before are going to be affecting emissions for the next 10, 20, 30 even 50 years ahead," Peters says.
And since any global deal will likely take effect in a decade or so, there's more time between now and then for more factories and more cars on the road.
"Then that loses 10 years," Peters says. "And it makes it very, very hard to get below 2 degrees. The most likely situation would be at least 2 degrees."
Increasingly, talk and money are moving from simply preventing such a future toward adapting to rising seas and less predictable rainfalls.
Private equity investor Rob Day at Black Coral Capital is betting on stormy weather ahead for agriculture.
"A lot of land that is currently being used for farmland won't be suitable anymore," Day says. "And so farmland as an asset is likely to become more valuable over time. So let's get some now."
Insurance companies are adapting, too. One key modeling firm, RMS, recently updated its assumptions to incorporate more severe events.
"They see higher risk for atlantic hurricanes due to higher sea surface temperatures," says Cynthia McHale of the investor/corporate coalition Ceres. "Based on that, insurance premiums are higher."
Some groups at the Doha talks figure it would take $100 billion to $150 billion a year to pay for poor countries to adapt to a warmer world. The pricetag for developed countries like the U.S.? That's even less known.
I think the UN's WMO (Weather Modification Oompaloompas) are not to be trusted. Check out the WMO publications based on their Weather Modification Conference last year:
http://santabarbaradianne.com/2012/12/02/is-man-caused-climate-change-a-...
Right to highlight the changing perception of value of ag land for example in a warmer world. A good follow up story Scott would be how the premium on land in the face of these changes will likely result in tougher access for the poor. Raises larger questions of how do we respond to climate change in ways that don't present more immediate and potentially more direct threat to the poor than the actual changes themselves. It isn't a case for not responding with both mitigation or adaptation but instead to realize that it can be done well and it can be done poorly and needs to be done with eyes open.
