2

Funding long-term health care reform

Coca-Cola products in a cooler at a convenience store.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Bill Radke: On Capitol Hill today, the Senate Finance Committee considers how to pay for health care reform. Covering 46 million uninsured Americans could cost $1.5 trillion over the next decade. How to pay for it? John Dimsdale considers the options.


John Dimsdale: One way is to squeeze waste from the existing health delivery system. Proposals include digital record-keeping and incentives to keep people out of hospitals.

Robert Blendon: All the things people are talking about have a real potential for savings long term, but not to get people covered in the short term.

Harvard University's Robert Blendon says it'll take five to 10 years before those improvements bear fruit. In the meantime, senators are considering taking away the tax deduction for employer-sponsored health insurance. That would mean a smaller paycheck for most workers.

The White House prefers cutting broader tax deductions for the rich. And there's the idea of higher sin taxes, including, for the first time, sugary soft drinks.

Blendon: You're going to have to pursue a source of revenue that's really quite large and the soda bottle and cigarettes and alcohol doesn't do it by itself.

Senators are trying to find a bipartisan solution that avoids turning too many powerful interest groups against reform.

In Washington, I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.

About the author

As head of Marketplace’s Washington, D.C. bureau, John Dimsdale provides insightful commentary on the intersection of government and money for the entire Marketplace portfolio.
V H's picture
V H - May 20, 2009

The frequent drumbeat of "taxing the rich" makes for a good sound-bite, but the analyses I've heard suggest that the total $ available this way is pretty small compared to the spending Obama wants to do. The super-rich, like Gates & Buffet, have billions of dollars but also have access to tax shelters that the upper-middle-class rich (annual income of $250,000 or so) do not. None of the plans put forward so far address this inequality. Plans like Increasing the top tax rate will not touch Gates or Buffet.

Nick Damato's picture
Nick Damato - May 20, 2009

I drink mostly diet soft drinks and fruit juices, so I wholeheartedly support a tax on sugary soft drinks to help pay for healthcare reform. Can we add a tax on fast food too? Where do I sign?