Study: Still waiting for efficiency gains from electronic medical records
Share Now on:
Electronic medical records were supposed to save us a lot of money. Government policies encouraged and then mandated health care providers make the switch, and those big stacks of manila folders are becoming increasingly scarce at doctors’ offices.
A new study from the RAND Corporation suggests those efficiency gains have failed to materialize, and they think they know why. Spencer Jones, an information scientist at RAND, discusses his corporation’s findings.
“The bulk of the cost savings were [supposed] to come from a reduction of redundant medical tests and reduction of adverse medication errors,” says Jones.
So why haven’t electronic medical records saved what they were supposed to?
“The assumption was that electronic health records would be inter-operable, that hasn’t happened yet. Most electronic health records do not talk to each other. If you are receiving care in one hospital and go to see a physician in another hospital, odds are those two physicians will not have access to the same information.”
We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.
Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.
In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.
Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.
Donate now to get almost any thank-you gift.