The gold-to-decent-suit ratio
A “long-held rule in the marketplace” is that an ounce of gold, historically, has been able to buy a decent suit.
That’s what it says on this cute press release I just got from Canadian investment management company, Sionna,
Sionna’s research shows “the cost for an ounce of gold in 1967 was C$35, exactly the same price as a decent suit from Eaton’s, a prominent Canadian retailer at the time. In 1975, gold weighed in at C$100 an ounce, a 1:1 ratio with a decent suit from Eaton’s during the same year. In 2009, the price of an ounce of gold in Canada soared to C$950, or the price of a decent suit at leading tailors during the same 12 months.”
Gold hit $1880 today, so I popped across to English Cut, a blog maintained by Thomas Mahon, an English tailor with a large American clientele. I like Tom becasue he tells great stories, his prices are pretty reasonable, compared with Savile Row, and because I was one of the first people to cover the launch of his blog.
An ounce of gold won’t even get close to a bespoke suit from Mahon (pictured above), who charges GBP2260 ($3616) for a two-piece. An ounce of the yellow stuff won’t even get you a blazer!
Which means you’ll have to go shop off the rack, I’m afraid, old boy!
We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.
Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.
In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.
Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.