In an age of encryption, one of the major innovations of Bitcoin is their block-chain technology, which allows for transaction to be encrypted and tracked.
In an age of encryption, one of the major innovations of Bitcoin is their block-chain technology, which allows for transaction to be encrypted and tracked. - 

Bitcoin has had a very tumultuous summer. As the valuation of the cryptocurrency climbed, experts opined about the potential “bitcoin bubble.” Bitcoin’s value, however, stumbled a bit over the past few weeks as Chinese regulators took steps to regulate the currency and its exchanges.

Let’s take a closer look at what exactly happened in China and why certain countries have decided to ban the cryptocurrencies to begin with it:

Did China actually ban bitcoin? 

China’s latest crackdown was specifically designed to target initial coin offerings (ICOs), according to Fran Strajnar, founder and CEO of Brave New Coin, a blockchain and digital currency market data company. ICOs have been used by startups to raise funds via selling tokens (or virtual currency such as bitcoin) to their early investors, similarly to the way that a company would sell shares during an initial public offering.

However, in the past, there have been fraudulent ICOs that targeted investors. Unlike IPOs, ICOs are unregulated, making recovery of lost funds difficult.

Earlier this month, the People’s Bank of China stated that ICOs are illegal and as a result crypto exchanges must stop any trading of ICO tokens. The bank also said that any startups that raised funds via ICOs were required to issue refunds.

“Thus we have seen major projects 'delisted' from exchanges and via private communications I can tell you there was quite a panic as multi-million dollar projects scrambled to essentially refund their crowd-sourced financing under the threat of penalties,” said Strajnar. According to her, figuring out how to issue refunds “was a logistical nightmare.”

Weeks after the bank made its announcement, The Wall Street Journal reported that the three “largest domestic exchanges — BTCC, Huobi and OKCoin —  all said they would halt trading services in the coming weeks.”

So while the People’s Bank of China did not actually ban bitcoin, it made trading it extremely difficult.

Why would countries ban ICOs or bitcoin?

Bitcoin transactions are encrypted and while they can be tracked by involved parties, bitcoin provides a way to keep money and transactions away from the prying eye of the regulators. 

“There is a risk that it could be used to fund crime or illicit terrorist activity — another reason is that it can be a route to circumvent capital controls,” explained Charlie Hayter, founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency data analysis firm CryptoCompare. “Rich Chinese don't want their money stashed in China as if they fall foul of some party apparatchik they can have it all confiscated.”

The People’s Bank of China has claimed that ICOs were a threat to the financial markets’ stability. Thanks to its decision to make ICOs illegal, the bank now has power to “shut down any exchange it wishes for violating their ruling,” according to Strajnar. 

“The People’s Bank of China now has a nice environment where it is impossible to comply, allowing it to penalize any issuance or exchange it wants to. Since then they have gone after some less than savoury operators, which is why we have seen news of number of Chinese ICO platforms and exchanges closing down. The top tier exchanges have the resources and procedures to keep their heads above the PBoC water, so to speak,” she said.  

Have there been other countries that have taken similar actions?

Among countries to have banned bitcoin in the past are Bangladesh, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Kyrgyzstan. The bans seem to have had little effect on the global bitcoin network.

“These countries are of little consequence to the global cryptocurrency liquidity or global blockchain industry direction,” explained Strajnar.

In 2014, Bangladesh banned use of bitcoin as part of its anti-money laundering efforts.

"Bitcoin is not a legal tender of any country. Any transaction through bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency is a punishable offense," the bank said at the time.

The announcement came just months after Vietnam also banned bitcoin, claiming that virtual currencies are often linked to money laundering and other illegal activities.

Not all countries think banning cryptocurrencies is a way to go. Consider Russia. Earlier this month, the country’s Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said that regulation is the way to go.

"The state understands indeed that cryptocurrencies are real. There is no sense in banning them, there is a need to regulate them," he said. He did however add that investing in cryptocurrencies is risky and insecure. 

Reuters, which reported on Siluanov’s comments, also pointed out that the Russian central bank previously “said such currencies were used in illegal operations, such as money laundering, and promised to crack down on the instrument.”

What about the U.S.? 

There has been a push to regulate bitcoin in some small ways. For example, in 2014, the IRS ruled that bitcoin should be considered as assets. The decision meant that Americans who owned bitcoin would have to pay taxes on it.

In 2015, Coinbase launched the first U.S.-based licensed exchange for people to trade the cryptocurrency. Now, two and a half years later it’s already run afoul of the IRS by refusing to disclose information about its users who have traded more than $20,000 worth of bitcoin. The two are supposed to face off in court later this year.

The lack of legal support behind bitcoin is also a cause for concern for JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. While speak at a conference last week, Dimon called Bitcoin a fraud and said it would eventually “blow up.”

"Here is a reason: Governments, first thing they do is form a currency. They like to control the currency. They control it through the central bank. They also like to know who has it, where it is, where it’s going ” he told CNBC, pointing out that this is exactly why the People’s Bank of China decided to make ICOs illegal and was winding down some of the exchanges.

 

Follow Jana Kasperkevic at @kasperka