The future of the Affordable Care Act in the Supreme Court’s hands
Share Now on:
Among the many uncertainties that follow the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday comes the future of the Affordable Care Act, which the Supreme Court is set to revisit later this fall. Ginsburg was expected to a be a voice in upholding the act.
The case argues that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional because of a 2017 change that got rid of penalties for people who didn’t sign up for health insurance. The idea here is that if one piece of the ACA is invalid, the whole law is invalid.
Janai Nelson, associate director counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said that without Ginsburg’s vote and powerful dissent, the future of the ACA is unclear.
“It’s still possible in theory that the justices uphold this provision of the Affordable Care Act. But Justice Ginsburg was instrumental in shaping the court’s views around the Affordable Care Act,” Nelson said.
Nelson said the ACA has been critical in providing health care to marginalized communities. More than 20 million Americans have relied on the Affordable Care Act to gain health insurance.
We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.
Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.
In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.
Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.