Support our non-partisan non-profit newsroom 💜 Donate now

Food is at the center of US-UK trade concerns

Stephen Beard Aug 11, 2017
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Pedigree Aberdeen Angus beef cattle on a farm in Macclesfield, England.  Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Food is at the center of US-UK trade concerns

Stephen Beard Aug 11, 2017
Pedigree Aberdeen Angus beef cattle on a farm in Macclesfield, England.  Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
HTML EMBED:
COPY

President Trump has promised a “big, big” free trade agreement with the U.K. once that country leaves the European Union in 2019. The British cabinet is, however, split over the prospect. Some ministers believe that Britain should clinch a deal with the U.S. at any cost. But others fear that a free trade deal would lift the existing European ban on the importation of some controversial American farm products and that could undermine British food standards.

American chlorine-washed chicken tops the list of products that are causing concern. European critics say that the American practice of rinsing slaughtered chickens with disinfectant to kill bacteria implies a lower standard of animal husbandry.

“What it means is that those chickens can be kept in less sanitary conditions while they’re alive, and they can be slaughtered in less sanitary conditions,” said Nick Dearden of the campaign group Global Justice Now. “In Britain, we prefer to use vaccination and keeping the animals in more hygienic conditions to ward off infection. We believe it’s better for the animals.” 

Animal welfare concerns are also said to lie behind the ban on American hormone-treated beef. The former head of Britain’s Food Standards Agency, John Krebs (now Lord Krebs), said that many British consumers prefer what he calls “a more natural” method of raising livestock.

“In the U.K., we’re used to seeing beef cattle grazing outside in a natural situation, whereas in the U.S., they’re raised in intensive rearing pens and they’re given hormones to make them grow faster,” Krebs said.

The U.S. farm lobby dismisses these objections as protectionist and hypocritical. 

But the big fear is that American farmers, benefiting from huge economies of scale, will flood the British market with cheap produce and trigger a race to the bottom. Food prices could plummet, dragging down animal welfare, environmental standards and even food quality.

Tim Lang, professor of food policy at City University, forecasts that a free trade deal between the U.S. and the U.K. will spark a battle over food culture in Britain.  

“Since it has been a member of the European Union, Britain has ratcheted up its standards,” Lang said. “The people have got better food, there’s more diversity. There’s a Europeanization of culinary culture. And we’re going to see whether it becomes the McDonaldization of culture.”

Britain’s farm and environment minister, Michael Gove, insists these fears are misplaced and that the U.K. will not dilute its food standards in pursuit of any trade deal.

But the trade minister, Liam Fox, has been much less emphatic.

“We must keep an open mind on these issues, and anyway, a decision on the terms of any U.S.-U.K. trade deal is still a long way off,” he said.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.