How do you lock down a city like Boston and how much does it cost?

A SWAT team member scouts the perimeter of South Station on April 19, 2013 in Boston, Mass. South Station was shut down and heavily guarded with police in response to the early morning shootings in Cambridge and Watertown.

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick made the call early this morning, and quickly -- and systematically -- the lockdown was underway.

Peter Boynton, co-director of the Kostas Research Institute for Homeland Security at Northeastern University, says the fact that a lockdown of this size happened so fast and so smoothly is because of investments at the federal, state and local levels made after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

“Additional and helpful equipment, staffing and personnel, and then also, training and exercising,” Boynton says.

The lockdown was lifted Friday afternoon.

New emergency notification systems, like “ALERTBoston,” got the word out city-wide, but also at the neighborhood level, by e-mail and text message. Law enforcement used social media and electronic billboards. They went through photos and videos from hundreds of surveillance cameras across the greater Boston area. And all that costs money.

“Typically, equipment of this sort, in the post-9/11 era, has been paid for, to a large degree, by federal grants,” Boynton explains.

Those grants also paid for personnel and improving how first responders communicate.

Brian Jackson is a security analyst with the RAND Corporation who marvels at the scale and the scope of this operation, and the technology involved.

“You can only imagine the tactical communication that is required to coordinate searches of this magnitude,” he says.

When the accountants add all this up -- and it won’t be for a while, Jackson says, the biggest line item isn’t going to be equipment, it’s going to be the manhunt.

“The price tag for the operation itself is measured in the overtime and the costs paid to have all of those people out and doing the searching,” he says.

Over time, he says, that’s going to cost millions.

Peter Judge, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency, said ballparking the price tag of the equipment, the training and the thousands of police officers was not a concern.

“It’s going to be a very big number, but right now, we’re not worried about what the costs are.”

The priority, he says, is the safety of everyone in the region.

About the author

David Gura is a reporter for Marketplace, based in the Washington, D.C. bureau.
Log in to post2 Comments

Whoa, whoa, whoa. The cost is not just the millions spent for first responders and other government/official folks.

The REAL cost is millions...probably tens of millions, maybe hundreds of millions...in lost productivity from millions of workers who either had to stay home or couldn't get to work because the entire MBTA was shut down, and also all the shops that were forced to be closed or might as well be closed with no customers.

Hell, how much did the lockdown cancelling tonight's Red Sox game cost all the surrounding businesses that depend on games happening at Fenway Park?

I can see locking down the specific town where the suspect was believe to be in. Maybe the surrounding towns, too...bearing in mind that "towns" in New England are comparatively tiny, usually a mile or two on a side, and are more like what the rest of America would think of as a "neighborhood" within a city (Watertown is only 5 miles from Copley Square, where the Marathon route ends).

But locking down the entire city? Where's the cost/benefit analysis here?

Excellent point, above. I've been asking that question all over, and nobody wants to field it. Bottom line: Sadly, it's obvious that The bad guys won this round.

With Generous Support From...