Three fish and the Supreme Court

Lizzie O'Leary Oct 10, 2014
HTML EMBED:
COPY

Three fish and the Supreme Court

Lizzie O'Leary Oct 10, 2014
HTML EMBED:
COPY

What does Enron have in common with a fish?

The Supreme Court of the United States is considering a case that shows how a business very different from yours might affect you in ways you never imagined.

After Enron collapsed, a law called “Sarbanes Oxley” made it a crime to destroy documents and other tangible objects. It turns out “tangible objects” might include… fish. 

John Yates, a commercial fisherman in the Gulf Coast, caught a bunch of grouper under the legal size limit. Fish and wildlife agents ordered him to bring them to a nearby port. Yates allegedly tossed them overboard instead, and was charged with destroying tangible objects under Sarbanes Oxley.

We wanted to get a sense of how this case is playing in the Gulf, so we spoke to Dean Blanchard, who runs a seafood company in Grand Isle Louisiana. 

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.