Why we’re still talking about Glass-Steagall

Tracey Samuelson Jul 19, 2016
Share Now on:
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Sen. Carter Glass and Rep. Henry B. Steagall, the co-sponsors of the Glass–Steagall Act. Wikimedia Commons

Why we’re still talking about Glass-Steagall

Tracey Samuelson Jul 19, 2016
Sen. Carter Glass and Rep. Henry B. Steagall, the co-sponsors of the Glass–Steagall Act. Wikimedia Commons
Share Now on:
HTML EMBED:
COPY

Republicans have called for the reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act in their party platform approved Monday, a last minute addition that’s somewhat surprising, given the GOP is more typically associated with deregulation and the Depression-era banking regulation has been a significant part of Bernie Sanders’ campaign. It’s also in a draft of the Democratic party platform, which will be approved next week.

Glass-Steagall, part of the Bank Act of 1933, was drafted as a response to the stock market crash of 1929.

“It was thought that banks should stick to the traditional activities, taking in deposits and making loans to businesses or individuals, and stay away from the stock market,” said James Barth, a finance professor at Auburn University.

The law sought to create a firewall between commercial and investment banking.

“A lot of people feel that was a solid thing to have,” said Doug Branson, a business law professor at the University of Pittsburgh. “It limited the amount of risk that these entities, on either side of the fence, could take on.”

Glass-Steagall was essentially undone under President Bill Clinton in 1999. In recent years, Glass-Steagall has become a symbol of deregulation; calls to reinstate it represent efforts to make banks simpler and smaller.

“It’s a return through rose-colored lenses to a simpler, happier time,” said Donald Lamson, counsel at the law firm Squire Patton Boggs. “It makes good politics. No politician ever lost votes running against a bank. Who loves their bank, really?”

But Lamson argued having different businesses and diverse revenue streams can actually be a good thing for the financial health of banks.

And it wouldn’t have prevented the recent financial crisis, said Aaron Klein, a fellow at the Brookings Institution.

“Glass-Steagall is a simple rallying cry about a set of ideas and values,” he said. “When you actually look at the prescriptive policies contained in Glass-Steagall, they don’t really make sense in a modern era.”

If you’re a member of your local public radio station, we thank you — because your support helps those stations keep programs like Marketplace on the air.  But for Marketplace to continue to grow, we need additional investment from those who care most about what we do: superfans like you.

Your donation — as little as $5 — helps us create more content that matters to you and your community, and to reach more people where they are – whether that’s radio, podcasts or online.

When you contribute directly to Marketplace, you become a partner in that mission: someone who understands that when we all get smarter, everybody wins.

We’re here for you.

As COVID-19 reshapes our economy, our newsletter will help you unpack the news from the day.