Hillary Clinton’s email isn’t necessarily insecure

Molly Wood Mar 3, 2015
HTML EMBED:
COPY

Hillary Clinton’s email isn’t necessarily insecure

Molly Wood Mar 3, 2015
HTML EMBED:
COPY

In the controversies over Hillary Clinton’s decision to use a private email address for official correspondence as U.S. Secretary of State, one theme has been the question of whether, in doing so, she created a security risk. 

However, Hillary Clinton wasn’t a typical worker using gmail to avoid a little hassle. She had her own email system. And unofficial doesn’t have to mean unsafe.

“Just the fact it’s not part of the government’s email system doesn’t mean its insecure,” says Larry Ponemon, chairman of the Ponemon Institute, which studies cyber-security.

Big institutions, with robust security budgets — think Target or Sony — haven’t been immune from cyber-attacks.

Poneman says someone with enough money and motivation could create a good system. And smaller systems have advantages: Fewer users means fewer people who could slip up and compromise security.

“It could be very secure and make it harder for the bad guy to actually find it,” says Poneman. “Because it’s small, it becomes — not invisible, but it’s not as easy to find it and basically do bad things.”

Marketplace is on a mission.

We believe Main Street matters as much as Wall Street, economic news is made relevant and real through human stories, and a touch of humor helps enliven topics you might typically find…well, dull.

Through the signature style that only Marketplace can deliver, we’re on a mission to raise the economic intelligence of the country—but we don’t do it alone. We count on listeners and readers like you to keep this public service free and accessible to all. Will you become a partner in our mission today?

Your donation is critical to the future of public service journalism. Support our work today – for as little as $5 – and help us keep making people smarter.