Hosting the Olympics and coming away with a profit? Imagine that. Three cities that bucked the trend

Tobin Low May 29, 2014

Hosting the Olympics and coming away with a profit? Imagine that. Three cities that bucked the trend

Tobin Low May 29, 2014

With such high costs, it’s seemingly miraculous that any chosen location manages to turn a profit. Yet, some manage to do so. Here are three cities that managed to come out of their hosting stint on top:

1. Los Angeles – Surplus: $232.5 Million

The west coast city managed to end the games with a $232.5 million surpluss due to smart planning — like revamping old facilities as opposed to building new ones — and budgeting. The design teams also used cheaper materials typically associated with temporary tents. You can read more about how L.A. pulled it off here.

2. Salt Lake City – Surplus: $56 Million

Salt Lake City donated about $30 million of their profits to the Utah Athletic Foundation.

3.  Atlanta – Surplus: $10 Million

Aside from finishing in the black, Atlanta also benefitted from converting one of its Olympic stadiums into a facility for baseball.

Marketplace is on a mission.

We believe Main Street matters as much as Wall Street, economic news is made relevant and real through human stories, and a touch of humor helps enliven topics you might typically find…well, dull.

Through the signature style that only Marketplace can deliver, we’re on a mission to raise the economic intelligence of the country—but we don’t do it alone. We count on listeners and readers like you to keep this public service free and accessible to all. Will you become a partner in our mission today?

Your donation is critical to the future of public service journalism. Support our work today – for as little as $5 – and help us keep making people smarter.