What GM’s mea culpa could mean for the brand

David Gura Apr 2, 2014
HTML EMBED:
COPY

What GM’s mea culpa could mean for the brand

David Gura Apr 2, 2014
HTML EMBED:
COPY

Mary Barra, the newly appointed CEO of General Motors spent another day on Capitol Hill, testifying before lawmakers about why it took GM a decade to recall millions of cars with defective ignition switches.

Barra apologized again today, but how well GM will weather public outcry is still a question.  The company’s success at selling cars after this crisis ends “depends on whether this is attributed to the old GM or the new GM” says David Vinjamuri, author of “Accidental Branding”.

Vinjamuri is impressed at how well Barra has handled the recall so far. He says Barra and GM showed they were serious when they brought on Kenneth Feinberg, the attorney known for his work with compensation funds. Feinberg worked with victims of 9/11 and the BP Oil Spill, for example.  

Bringing on Feinberg also shows General Motors is looking for a quick — rather than inexpensive — way of putting the recall behind them, and it seems likely they’ll pay the families of crash victims related to the recall.

It’s smart for GM to agree to a large payout early on, says Vinjamuri, because in the long run, they’ll make that money back only if American car-buyers learn to trust the company again.

As a nonprofit news organization, our future depends on listeners like you who believe in the power of public service journalism.

Your investment in Marketplace helps us remain paywall-free and ensures everyone has access to trustworthy, unbiased news and information, regardless of their ability to pay.

Donate today — in any amount — to become a Marketplace Investor. Now more than ever, your commitment makes a difference.