Over the weekend, President Obama said he intends to take military action against Syria. His administration claims the Syrian government used chemical weapons, which killed more than 1,000 people.
But before he authorizes a military strike, the president says he wants to get approval from Congress.
Today, he and his advisers met with lawmakers. Tomorrow, the Senate is scheduled to hold hearings on Capitol Hill. House Speaker John Boehner says we can expect an up or down vote as early as next week.
Gideon Rachman is the chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times. He says American leaders can learn from what happened in Britain last week.
“One thing you could learn is that you need to prepare these things — partly because [David] Cameron felt that Britain had to get this debate through very quickly because military action seemed imminent,” says Rachman. “The whole debate was botched…but I think one thing that Obama will learn is that you can just assume people will go through the lobbies in support of reaction.”
It could be difficult to get the support of lawmakers in Washington, for this kind of operation, warns Rachman. But he says with national security issues, people tend to be more prepared to bury partisan differences.
“The Americans clearly are more wary of military action than they were before Iraq and Afghanistan,” he argues. “But still perhaps conscious of their role as global policemen, and more prepared to play that role.”
There’s a lot happening in the world. Through it all, Marketplace is here for you.
You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible.
Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.