Final Note

On the influence of money in politics

Kai Ryssdal Nov 7, 2012
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Final Note

On the influence of money in politics

Kai Ryssdal Nov 7, 2012
HTML EMBED:
COPY

A final note this day after Election Day about the influence of money on politics, and whether buckets full of money helped decide this year’s elections.

I mean, you don’t spend $100 million — like Karl Rove and his Republican super PAC American Crossroads did — without getting something for it, do you? Granted, he had a pretty good time on Fox News last night.

Or Las Vegas magnate Sheldon Adelson and his $53 million spread over six different — and losing — GOP candidates running this year.

You ask around on the other side of the aisle, and it’s a different story. The Democratic super PAC Priorities USA Action might say it very much got its money’s worth for the $67 million it spent on President Obama.

There’s been all kinds of talk this cycle about Citizens United, outside money and who can spend how much. But here’s the point: We really ought to figure out how we feel about money and politics in this country, ’cause we’re doing this whole thing all over again in 1,462 days.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.