🎁'Tis the season to support public service journalism Donate Now
Maps - Electricity

Bill Gates on the importance of energy research for the future

Jeremy Hobson Sep 14, 2011
Maps - Electricity

Bill Gates on the importance of energy research for the future

Jeremy Hobson Sep 14, 2011

Jeremy Hobson: A group of corporate leaders, including General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt and Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, has a message for politicians in Washington: We’re not spending nearly enough money researching new energy technology.

The group is called the American Energy Innovation Council, and its members met with lawmakers from both parties on Capitol Hill yesterday.

We’re pleased to be joined now by a member of the council. Bill Gates,Welcome to Marketplace.

Bill Gates: Great to be here.

Hobson: Well what exactly are you asking Washington to do?

Gates: A group of business leaders came together to say that the investment in energy research is much lower than it needs to be. Whether it’s for getting low-cost energy or securing our energy supply or reducing environmental damage, we need breakthroughs. And the government funds research in a lot of areas, but in the case of energy, it’s very low. So we said that playing their key role, that that’s got to be increased by about $8 billion a year.

Hobson: But that’s a pretty big thing to ask for at a time when they’re facing big trillion-dollar budget deficits.

Gates: Well, if you look at the country’s challenges in terms of the trade deficit and the impact that has on the economy, energy spending is a big factor there. I do think investing in the future is important at all times. The U.S. is by far the best at doing this type of innovation; it’s the support of our universities and startups, national laboratories, that really put us in a position to make breakthroughs that will help meet the world’s energy needs, but also create great companies and great jobs here.

Hobson: When I think of the philanthropic work that you do and your foundation does, I think of things like education and health care. What got you so interested in energy research?

Gates: Energy’s very important no matter where you live on the planet. The long-term implications of not making changes are very dire, but the poorest people are the ones who are the most hurt by the high costs of energy. They want to buy fertilizer, they want to have lights at night, they want to have a stove to cook their food, they want to be able to get to their job. And so if we can make innovations in this space, the best impact goes to the people our foundation thinks about all the time. And yet it needs to be done using the kind of scientific research backing that’s been used to create the IT industry and medical breakthroughs — places the U.S. has really led the way.

Hobson: But a lot of the ideas that involve investment right now involve public-private partnerships. How do you get the private sector onboard for something like this?

Gates: The energy research includes a basic research component that would need to be government-funded. But as soon as you get past the conceptual level, as you’re starting to pilot things, then both venture capital and other private capital come in. And so there’s a part of this energy budget called ARPA-E where they look at really top technologies — they have contests — and then they require that private money come in to match their money. And that’s a very well-run program; in fact, there’s a debate about what level that should be. In our report, we say that alone should go up to $1 billion, but the current budget debate is between $180 million and $250 million.

Hobson: Now you’re calling for all this increase in energy research funding here in the United States. You travel all over the world — how do we rank at this point when it comes to our funding of research for energy?

Gates: The quality of research in the U.S. is absolutely the best. The research funding we give to other areas, like medicine and information technologies, is the best in the world. In energy, we’re not the leader in funding, because it’s less than half a percent of the overall market. In fact, compared to every other area, it’s funded at quite a low level, which given the important issues that it touches on — including overall competitiveness of all kinds of products because they use electricity in their manufacturer — it’s just short-sighted not to be doing more.

Hobson: Give us a sense of what you think is possible if the kind of investment in energy research that you would like actually takes place. Ten, 15 years from now — what do we have?

Gates: Well the goal is not to pick a particular technology, but there’s no doubt that in the solar area, with a variety of different approaches, there should be breakthroughs to make that quite economic; in the wind area. Even using today’s energy sources, making them less expensive and finding ways to take the pollution and the CO2 out of those and make sure it’s not causing a problem. These are the kind of tough challenges that researchers absolutely can solve if they get the right level of backing.

Hobson: If President Obama is replaced next year by one of his Republican rivals — let’s say Rick Perry or Mitt Romney — do you think that you can convince them to go along with something like this?

Gates: The hope is that investment and research is not a partisan issue, that believing we have the best scientists that that helps create leading companies, because we’ve backed those scientists. We’ve seen it play out in the personal computer and software field, we’ve seen it play out in the medical industries. The one that there’s a real question on is in the energy business, so I hope that we can get broad consensus even though the budget is more of a challenge today than it’s ever been.

Hobson: Finally, since so much of Washington’s ability to make these kinds of investments hinge on the state of the economy, how would you rate Washington’s handling of the economy?

Gates: I’m not an economist. All of us wish that more jobs were being created and there’s a lot of talk about how best to do that. Certainly innovation, if you take the right timeframe, is the reason why I’m optimistic that we will see improvements, both in the economy and the types of goods that get made. It’s easy to underestimate innovation and what it means, but in the near-term, we’re in the hands of what the economists and the politicians can do. As you move out in time, if you fund innovation, then you can very optimistic about where things go.

Hobson: Bill Gates, who is in a push for more investment in energy research. Mr. Gates, thanks so much for joining us.

Gates: Thank you.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.