Was Barclays’ Lehman windfall unfair?

Stephen Beard Apr 26, 2010
HTML EMBED:
COPY

Was Barclays’ Lehman windfall unfair?

Stephen Beard Apr 26, 2010
HTML EMBED:
COPY

TEXT OF STORY

Stacey Vanek-Smith: Today, a U.S. court today looks at one key event of the financial crisis: the collapse of Lehman Brothers. At issue: whether the British bank Barclays took advantage of Wall Street’s freefall — and ripped off Lehman’s creditors. From London, Stephen Beard reports.


Stephen Beard: Barclays bought Lehman’s U.S. brokerage business days after the company failed in the fall of 2008. The British bank paid less than $2 billion, and then made $11 billion on the deal. Barclays says it took the risk and earned the reward.

David Buik of BGC Partners in London agrees. He says when most investors were panicking, the British bank bought the Lehman assets fair and square.

David Buik: I have to say that Barclays deserve the most enormous amount of credit for having the courage to do so. It was a very dramatic time, and you know, most people thought that financially the whole place was imploding.

But Lehman’s creditors says this was an unfair windfall. In effect, Barclays stole their assets. The court case which begins in the U.S. today is likely to drag on for months, with a ruling expected by the end of the year.

In London, this is Stephen Beard for Marketplace.

We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.

Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.

In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.

Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.