TEXT OF STORY
Steve Chiotakis: There’s a lot of criticism being pointed at accounting giant Ernst & Young. That’s after last week’s report on the collapse of Lehman Brothers. The bankruptcy examiner in the case took Ernst & Young to task for not challenging Lehman’s shady accounting practices.
And as Sarah Gardner reports, that criticism is tarnishing the industry’s image.
Sarah Gardner: Ernst & Young signed off on Lehman’s financial statements despite the bank’s use of what the examiner called “accounting gimmicks” that effectively masked billions in debt.
Steven Thomas, an attorney suing Ernst & Young in a separate case, says the big accounting firms are ineffectual watchdogs.
STEVEN THOMAS: If you go all the way back to Enron, you see that in almost every instance where we have numbers on Wall Street causing great harm, there was a certified public accountant who reviewed the numbers and gave them their stamp of approval.
But Randy Beatty, dean of USC’s Accounting School, believes Ernst & Young followed the law. He says Lehman’s risky financial deals, not its auditors, caused its collapse.
RANDY BEATTY: To my mind, the auditors are simply the folks on the sidelines that are trying to provide a snapshot of what’s going on in the corporation.
Yesterday, though, Britain’s top accounting regulator said he’s now investigating Ernst & Young’s Lehman audits there.
I’m Sarah Gardner for Marketplace.
There’s a lot happening in the world. Through it all, Marketplace is here for you.
You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible.
Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.