My Two Cents

Homeownership and immigrants and minorities

Chris Farrell May 12, 2009

An important new study looks into homeownership, minorities and immigrants over the past decade and a half. In Through Boom and Bust: Minorities, Immigrants and Homeownership by Pew Hispanic Center researchers Rakesh Kochhar, Ana Gonzalez-Barrera, and Daniel Dockterman found the U.S. housing boom and bust generated greater gains and larger losses for minority groups than it has for whites.

That’s not so surprising. But I found these results particularly striking.

1) Overall, the ups and downs in the housing market since 1995 have reduced the homeownership gap between whites and all racial and ethnic minority groups. However, a substantial gap persists. As of 2008, 74.9% of whites owned homes, compared with 59.1% of Asians, 48.9% of Hispanics and 47.5% of blacks.

2) The recent decline in the homeownership rate has hit native-born heads of households harder than immigrant householders. Immigrant householders are less likely than native-born householders to be homeowners (52.9% versus 70.0% in 2008) but their losses in recent years have been smaller than those of the native born.

3) The explanation for the relatively modest impact of the recent housing market turmoil on immigrants appears to lie in the changing characteristics of the foreign born. Among other things, the typical immigrant in 2008 had spent more years in the U.S. and was more likely to be a U.S. citizen than was the typical immigrant in 1995. Those factors, strongly associated with higher rates of homeownership, appear to have mitigated recent troubles in the housing market among immigrants.

Taken altogether, this raises a question: The assumption has been that the rise in homeownership among minorities and immigrants was a mistake. These are people with low, fragile incomes that shouldn’t have bought homes. But going through the data I wonder if the far bigger problem was the subprime mortgage itself? In other words, homeownership wasn’t a mistake (at least for many) but the mortgage instrument guaranteed failure.

A number of conservative critics believe the subprime mortgage implosion reflects bad public policy pushing homeownership too far. I have a feeling it was simpler than that–it was bad, lax regulation. Homeownership among minorities, immigrants and low income communities could go up with a simpler, low-fee transparent mortgage–everything the subprime mortgage wasn’t.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.  

Need some Econ 101?

Our new Marketplace Crash Course is here to help. Sign-up for free, learn at your own pace.