We demand to see more transparency
Share Now on:
TEXT OF COMMENTARY
Kai Ryssdal: Ever since the banking system really went off the rails back last September — when Henry Paulson went to Congress with a two and a half page proposal that asked for $700 billion — there has been a certain lack of forthrightness about what the money is being spent on. And there still is. Commentator and economist Dean Baker says it’s time for the Obama administration to make good on its promise for more transparency.
DEAN BAKER: There’s been a lot of talk in Washington about a new era of openness and accountability, but when it comes to the bank bailouts, we’ll still
in the bad old days.
We know the basic story. The banks got into trouble with complex financial derivatives that they apparently didn’t understand. Their losses left many bankrupt. And the taxpayers must either cough up the money or watch the financial system collapse.
Well, the taxpayers still have some options. Specifically, we have the right to demand that that money going out the door is actually used to prop up the banking system and not some well-connected hedge fund’s gambling habit. At this point, we just don’t know.
The secrecy problem is clearest with AIG, the giant insurer that has been largely taken over by the government. The government has already lent AIG $160 billion, and will almost certainly lend more in the future. Most of this money will not be repaid.
AIG needs taxpayer dollars because it made hundreds of billions of dollars of commitments in the form of “credit default swaps,” which are a type of bond insurance. AIG has to pay out on these credit default swaps because many of the bonds they insured, which include mortgage
backed securities, are going bad at record rates.
The government has no legal obligation to honor AIG’s credit default swaps, but ostensibly it is choosing to do so because these swaps are held by financial institutions that could fail if the credit default swaps were not honored.
The problem is that the public has no idea if this claim is true because we don’t know who holds the swaps and how much they are owed. We don’t know if the Fed is only honoring AIG’s credit default swaps to ensure the solvency of banks and pension funds, or whether it may be paying off credit default swaps even in cases where hedge funds or other speculators were just making a bet that a bond would go bad.
The Fed and the Treasury are asking us to trust them with our money. But these are the people who completely missed the buildup of this financial bubble and minimized the problem at every turn. Their track record does not warrant much trust at this point.
Kai Ryssdal:Dean Baker is the co-director at the Center for Economic Policy Research.
There’s a lot happening in the world. Through it all, Marketplace is here for you.
You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible.
Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.