The Senate is not stimulated

John Dimsdale Feb 7, 2008
HTML EMBED:
COPY

The Senate is not stimulated

John Dimsdale Feb 7, 2008
HTML EMBED:
COPY

TEXT OF STORY

Scott Jagow: Well, it’s back to the drawing board on the stimulus package. It failed in the Senate by one vote. John Dimsdale reports on what’s holding things up.


John Dimsdale: Senate Democrats want to add $40 billion to the package negotiated by House members and President Bush. Some of the extra money would boost unemployment benefits and home heating assistance for poor families.

The Economic Policy Institute’s Jared Bernstein says putting cash in the pockets of the poor and unemployed would give the economy a quick jolt:

Jared Bernstein: That will get you a bigger bang for the buck, because those folks by definition almost are income constrained. They’re more likely to go out and spend the money.

But Republicans successfully argued the additional stimulus is too costly, and Wall Street Journal editorial writer Stephen Moore fears the rebates will be too late to help the economy.

Stephen Moore: That’s been the traditional problem with these stimulus packages in the past. By the time the money gets out to be spent, we’re out of the recession, we’re already in the recovery phase of the business cycle.

Senate Republicans are proposing a compromise that adds rebate checks for veterans and Social Security recipients, but would not extend unemployment benefits.

In Washington, I’m John Dimsdale for Marketplace.

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.