Publications want lower postal rates

Jeremy Hobson Oct 30, 2007


Scott Jagow: From interest rates to postal rates. Today, Congress holds a hearing on how much magazines pay for mailing. The rates just went up in July, and a lot of small publications say it could put them out of business. Jeremy Hobson reports from Washington.

Jeremy Hobson: The new rates make it cheaper for publishers that do the most mailing to use the Postal Service. Some small publications are seeing postal rate increases of 20 percent or more.

Victor Navasky is testifying today. He’s publisher emeritus of The Nation magazine.

Victor Navasky: It’s costing us another $500,000, in a magazine that has always been on the edge.

Gene Del Polito is with the Association for Postal Commerce, which represents 180 companies, including Time Warner. He says if postal rates are affecting small magazines so much, there’s something wrong with their business models.

Gene Del Polito: So the problem is not with the Postal Service. I mean, the Postal Service in this instance is the tail on the dog.

Both sides agree it’s unlikely Congress will do anything about the current rate structure, and that today’s hearing has more to do with sparing small publications from being hit by future rate hikes.

In Washington, I’m Jeremy Hobson for Marketplace.

We’re here to help you navigate this changed world and economy.

Our mission at Marketplace is to raise the economic intelligence of the country. It’s a tough task, but it’s never been more important.

In the past year, we’ve seen record unemployment, stimulus bills, and reddit users influencing the stock market. Marketplace helps you understand it all, will fact-based, approachable, and unbiased reporting.

Generous support from listeners and readers is what powers our nonprofit news—and your donation today will help provide this essential service. For just $5/month, you can sustain independent journalism that keeps you and thousands of others informed.