TEXT OF STORY
SCOTT JAGOW: Chicago may not be Wal-Mart’s kind of town. The city council votes today on a “living wage” ordinance. It would require big stores like Wal-Mart to pay workers more than the state’s minimum wage. Here’s Stacey Vanek-Smith.
STACEY VANEK-SMITH: Chicago would be the biggest city so far to pass a living wage ordinance, joining places like Santa Fe and San Francisco.
The law would require mega-retailers to pay workers at least $10 an hour by 2010. Advocates say at $6.50 an hour, Illinois’ minimum wage isn’t enough to live on in the Windy City and when huge stores like Wal-Mart pay those salaries, it can depress overall wages in the area.
Clark University labor expert Gary Chaison says these laws can hurt Wal-Mart, but not because of the money.
GARY CHAISON: I don’t think Wal-Mart is that much concerned about the economics of a living wage-what they are concerned with is probably the embarrassment that’s brought on.
Critics say these laws could drive employers out taking jobs and wages with them.
I’m Stacey Vanek-Smith for Marketplace.
As a nonprofit news organization, our future depends on listeners like you who believe in the power of public service journalism.
Your investment in Marketplace helps us remain paywall-free and ensures everyone has access to trustworthy, unbiased news and information, regardless of their ability to pay.
Donate today — in any amount — to become a Marketplace Investor. Now more than ever, your commitment makes a difference.