1

There's more to an inheritance than money

Columnist and author Paul Sullivan.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF COMMENTARY

Tess Vigeland: On last week's show we had a conversation about what it's like to be part of the "Sandwich Generation," caring financially for children and aging parents at the same time.

This week a follow-up question: If family finances are being drawn down to help with costs for Grandma and Grandpa, what happens to the idea of inheritance?

That question got commentator and New York Times Wealth columnist Paul Sullivan thinking about what to leave behind.


Paul Sullivan: Most people hear the word inheritance and think about money. I don't. It's the least of my worries when it comes to my daughter. She just had her first birthday in August. The money part was pretty straightforward. We contacted an attorney. We looped in our financial adviser. Most importantly, we picked a guardian.

It wasn't cheap, and it took a lot of time to do. But that was easy compared to what lies ahead. The crucial part of our daughter's inheritance is what we teach her about making her way in the world.

We live in Fairfield County, Conn. It's a very nice place, but it's not normal. Many children our daughter plays with come from families whose wealth is measured in the tens of millions, if not billions of dollars. There are tremendous advantages to this, like a tax base that funds great schools.

Of course, I want our daughter to know she is fortunate to have these unique opportunities. But this will be a challenge: Here, an upper-middle-class kid looks poor compared to a billionaire's child.

For my wife, it's important to leave our daughter with a broader view of success. The schools around us send scores of kids to Ivy League universities every year. Maybe our daughter will go to one of them -- but this only counts as success if it's what she wants to do.

So far, she loves to eat. We joke that she might become a chef or a food critic. Either would be great -- as long as she wants to do it.

That's why I believe it is absurd for all but the richest families to get wrapped up in the amount of money they will leave their children. First, that fortune could disappear. Think of the people whose wealth was tied up in Lehman Brothers. Worse, waiting for it can leave heirs overly dependent on their parents well into adulthood.

What matters to us is that our daughter inherits a sense of independence and a sophisticated view of the world. This is far more important than money.


Vigeland: Paul Sullivan writes the Wealth Matters column for the New York Times and is the author of "Clutch: Why Some People Excel Under Pressure and Others Don't."

Charlie Bruns's picture
Charlie Bruns - Nov 13, 2010

Nice to hear that the emphasis is not on how much money can be left to the children. I noticed the reference to the expense of the inheritance plan. I guess it is better for the economy if we hire financial experts (who are at least heroes during good times)and attorneys to make sure that the money grows and taxes are minimized. Or would it be better to not pay the professionals so much and pay more taxes instead? Someone has to pay our country's expenses.