3
Intel aims to create more jobs
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.
TEXT OF INTERVIEW
Kai Ryssdal: The Senate is set to pass a $15 billion jobs bill this week. It's going to be mostly a payroll tax break for companies that hire people who've been unemployed. Technology workers have been doing better than most in hanging onto their jobs, though. But a coalition of high-tech companies and venture capital firms thinks there is more to do. Intel CEO Paul Ottelini made the announcement today. A $3.5 billion fund to invest in American technology companies and a jobs program by Intel, Google, Yahoo and a bunch of others to double the number of newly-graduated engineers that they hire every year. Paul Ottelini, welcome to the program.
Paul Ottelini: Thank you.
Ryssdal: $3.5 billion is a lot of money. Why did you feel the need to make this announcement now?
Ottelini: You know, I think that coming out of recessions it's all about attitude and confidence. The problems have been the level of investment and availability of start-up money and those kinds of things. This makes it really clear in very specific time frame that the venture community is open for business and willing to invest in start-ups in this country.
Ryssdal: One of the things you highlighted today was the need to put more college graduates to work right away, getting into this economy and getting going. How are you going to do that? I mean other people have tried to kick start the labor market.
Ottelini: Well, it's really simple. We had an idea that if the tech companies got together and would commit to essentially double their hiring of college graduates in 2010 versus 2009, that would be a big step forward. And in just a couple of weeks time we were able to get 17 tech companies to commit to 10,500 jobs, which will have an annual payroll of roughly a billion dollars.
Ryssdal: Is this a sign, you think, the fact that you were able to get 17 other companies to sign onto this initiative with you, is it a sign that companies are ready to hire again?
Ottelini: I think so. Each company might have its own motivation, but for tech companies, the latest and greatest graduates from universities are our life blood. And so by making this statement you make a pretty profound bet on the future, and you allow the colleges to be able to encourage their graduates to continue to work in these fields knowing that there will be jobs there.
Ryssdal: 10,000 jobs is a lot in absolute terms, but on the scale of things, within the U.S. job market, it's not all that significant.
Ottelini: As a percent of our engineering and scientific graduates, it's a pretty large number.
Ryssdal: You know, there's an opportunity cost when companies like yours make decisions. An American engineer is more expensive than an Indian engineer, an American manufacturing plant is more expensive than a manufacturing plant in South China. How do you rationalize those costs when you're trying to figure out the profitability of a company?
Ottelini: In our industry those numbers, those examples you gave aren't exactly true. In the semiconductor industry, or people that design circuits, or people who work in high-end software, entry-level engineers in the United States are not that much more expensive than they are in India now, given the wage inflation we've seen in India. Secondly, in terms of manufacturing semi-conductor factories and operating them, the operating costs aren't that much different, the construction costs aren't that much different, what is different is the package of incentives and grants some countries give to put a new factory in. In terms of how you rationalize that you look at the overall capabilities, the four factories that we're doing in the United States right now make a lot of sense given their local economics. The fact that we had a workforce for the most part in place, the fact that we had infrastructure in those sites.
Ryssdal: Paul Ottelini, the chairman and CEO of Intel. Mr. Ottelini, thanks so much for your time.
Ottelini: You're quite welcome. Thank you.
Doing research on motivation, I came across this article. The motivation here is mainly focused on large companies to hire the unemployed and in return receive a payroll tax break. It is interesting to note that hiring qualified unemployed workers was not Mr. Ottelini's main topic, but doubling their college graduate new hires. The comments made this article a much more interesting find. Muzo is commenting first hand while Brian brought up several valid points in which it would be very intriguing to hear Mr. Ottellini's responses.
It's interesting that Intel now views foreign engineers as being nearly as expensive as domestic engineering graduates. I work in an Intel wafer fab, and nearly all of the engineers there seem to be foreign nationals. The four that I work with directly are all Indian, and they seem to get paid less than many of the technicians while working much longer hours.
I found it surprising that Kai Ryssdal never questioned Mr. Ottelini of Intel why he was using "college graduates" as a carefully chosen euphemism for "younger workers." There are numerous college graduates over 40 who are struggling in this Great Recession, many of whom no doubt have given up applying for jobs at companies like Intel. Yet the entire focus of the interview was on hiring RECENT college graduates. There is name for this type of bias in hiring: It's called age discrimination, and it's illegal. Next time, please exercise just a bit more journalistic skepticism. Intel and the tech industry are essentially trying to cut costs by replacing the older workers they've cut (or are about to cut) with lower-cost younger workers under the guise of helping society absorb the surfeit of new graduates. That's drivel. The goal should be to hire the most qualified candidates, not the youngest. Bringing in qualified college graduates is a reasonable business goal. Ignorning applications from older workers is not.
