2

Waiting for Godot: Financial planners for the middle class

Question: I am searching for an appropriate financial adviser with whom I can work on such issues as Roth-IRA conversions, life insurance, retirement planning, saving for a university education for my daughter and modifying a trust, etc.

I have interviewed five persons/firms in the San Jose area working in the field of financial advising and it seems they all want to sell me something (e.g. life insurance, brokerage services) or don't want to be bothered with someone with net wealth below $1 million. I made it clear at the outset that I am seeking advice and expertise rather than products which I can shop around for myself. (I am an economist and fairly knowledgeable about money matters.) Two of the firms more or less said that they didn't have time for a client with a small account. (Maybe I live in a region that is too wealthy!)

Where can I find good, reasonably-priced expertise, advice and guidance on these matters? Salem, San Jose, CA

Answer: Your list of financial questions is reasonable, typical for a middle-income household with savings, a retirement plan, a home and children.. And it shouldn't be so hard to find "good, reasonably priced expertise, advice and guidance" on how to deal with them. Yet your experience is the usual experience for middle income households. It's one reason why I favor a DIY approach.

You also encountered a troubling reality in the financial advice industry: Almost anyone can call themselves a financial planner. Your list of financial questions is probably too braod for most planners to expertly cope with them. For instance, the so-called planner may really be a stock broker without any real knowledge about Roth-IRA conversions or a life insurance agent with little understanding of how to modify a trust.

Over the years I've emphasized that I favor fee-only certified financial planners (CFPs). They have the education and the knowledge to deal with all aspects of household finances. There simply aren't as many financial conflicts of interest with a straight forward fee. The planner can look at your whole financial situation rather than slices. Problem is, not only is this kind of advice is expensive but the planners really want to work with high net worth households (despite their repeated protestations to the contrary; high net worth individuals and families are an inegral part of their business model).

You could check out the fee-only planners at the Garrett Planning Network. The planners do focus on middle income households. They do this by breaking down the financial planning advice into pieces. In your case that might mean looking into your retirement savings at one point and college savings at another. You'll still have to find one you want to work with over time. Another fee-only network is the Alliance of Cambridge Advisors.

About the author

Chris Farrell is the economics editor of Marketplace Money.
Andy Tilp's picture
Andy Tilp - Nov 23, 2010

Chris,

As a member of the Garrett Planning Network, I appreciate your comments about the importance of seeking out a fee-only CFPs. We are dedicated to providing professional financial advice to individuals and families from all walks of life.

One small note on your comment above about "breaking down the plan into pieces". This is one option. However the other, (IMO) preferred option is to put together a plan that includes all aspects of their financial life, including those listed in the reader's question. The result is to put the many 'moving parts' of person's financial life into balance.

Also I'd like to note a key difference between a Garrett and/or NAFPA fee-only advisor and an advisor selling products is the level of fiduciary responsibility. My sole responsibility is to do what is best for the client. Whereas a sales-type advisor's responsibility is to maximize the revenue for their company. This brings in an obvious conflict of interest.

Andy

Julie's picture
Julie - Nov 29, 2010

What is the difference between Garrett and NAFPA fee-only advisors, if any?