3

Despite economic outlook, we're still fascinated by the super-rich

Warren Buffett (L) and Bill Gates.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: All right, so riddle me this: Does Donald Trump really belong on the list of the super-rich? And why are the names of some multi-billionaires missing from the popular rankings we get every year from Forbes magazine?

If questions like that lurk in the back of your mind, we may soon be getting a second opinion when it comes to who's ultra-wealthy, and who's not. Bloomberg News has just hired away the long time editor of the Forbes 400. And Bloomberg's said to be planning its own rankings as soon as next year.

But is this is really such a good time to be focusing on the rich? Here's our senior business correspondent Bob Moon.


Bob Moon: Even one of the richest men in the world, Warren Buffett, has been sensitive to his high-flying status, given the tough times facing the average wage earner.

Warren Buffett: He's been on a treadmill while the super-rich have been on a spaceship.

So why would Bloomberg News think now's the time to emphasize its coverage of the rich?

Jim Taylor: You would think that during the economic downtimes, there'd be less of a concern about the wealthy, or in fact negative feelings, anger or frustration toward the wealthy.

And you'd be wrong, says University of San Francisco psychologist Jim Taylor. He says from Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg to the fictional Carringtons of Dynasty, we've always been fascinated by the rich -- maybe even more so now.

Taylor: Escapism, fantasy, wishful thinking does, however unrealistically, provide some relief and comfort for people during these very difficult times.

Taylor says Americans have always been interested in who's made it and how they got there. Which is why the Wall Street Journal, too, has a writer focused on the wealthy, Robert Frank.

Robert Frank: Bill Gates is worth more than some small countries, and Mark Zuckerberg is 26 years old and already worth about, you know, whether it's $6 billion or $8 billion or $12 billion -- more than probably anyone his age has ever been worth. That tells the story of our times, in a way that we've never seen in history.

Frank expects Bloomberg to put special emphasis on global rankings, where he says emerging wealth holds its own fascination.

I'm Bob Moon for Marketplace.

About the author

Bob Moon is Marketplace’s senior business correspondent, based in Los Angeles.
Ben G's picture
Ben G - Jan 13, 2011

" ... we've always been fascinated by the rich -- maybe even more so now."

What are you talking about? The rich have always been fascinated with themselves. The rest of us are just pissed off at them for not pulling their own gargantuan weight while the country goes down the tubes, at the same time their income goes into the stratosphere from government bailouts and the stock market.

Sam Mandke's picture
Sam Mandke - Jan 12, 2011

I can't believe anyone is fascinated by the uber-rich these days. If we learned anything from the last two years, it should be that the game is rigged for the benefit of those who have at the expense of those who have not.

Jim G's picture
Jim G - Jan 11, 2011

No, you folks are the ones facinated with the super rich, it is your bread and butter so don't try to deceive the people of this country. You keep telling lies to uphold this capitalist country from falling completely apart. You take and take and take and keep doing so until nothing is left. Have you no shame? This country will soon be a rusty frame instead of the brilliant shining example it could have been. But very soon the goose that laid the golden egg will take your heads! You better get with the program. It is only a matter of time. You can't keep this charade up for too much longer.